2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2007.00035
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The K-Property for Some Unique Equilibrium States in Flows and Homeomorphisms

Abstract: We set out some general criteria to prove the K-property, refining the assumptions used in [5] for the flow case, and introducing the analogous discrete-time result. We also introduce one-sided λ-decompositions, as well as multiple techniques for checking the pressure gap required to show the Kproperty. We apply our results to the family of Mañé diffeomorphisms and the Katok map. Our argument builds on the orbit decomposition theory of Climenhaga and Thompson.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the pressure gap condition for such potentials in hand we briefly note a second class of potentials for which it holds. Proposition 4.7 of [Cal20] notes that if the pressure gap P (Sing, φ) < P (φ) holds for φ, then for any function sufficiently close to φ (specifically with 2 φ − ψ < P (φ) − P (Sing, φ)) and any constant c, P (Sing, ψ + c) < P (ψ + c). Applying this to the locally constant functions φ discussed in this section gives us a further class of potentials with a pressure gap.…”
Section: Note That E ′′mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With the pressure gap condition for such potentials in hand we briefly note a second class of potentials for which it holds. Proposition 4.7 of [Cal20] notes that if the pressure gap P (Sing, φ) < P (φ) holds for φ, then for any function sufficiently close to φ (specifically with 2 φ − ψ < P (φ) − P (Sing, φ)) and any constant c, P (Sing, ψ + c) < P (ψ + c). Applying this to the locally constant functions φ discussed in this section gives us a further class of potentials with a pressure gap.…”
Section: Note That E ′′mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For such a 'λ-decomposition', P = S and, roughly speaking, orbit segments in P and S have small average values of λ wheareas any initial or terminal segment of an element of G has average value of λ which is not small. Furthermore, by utilizing a λ-decomposition, we are able to appeal to the following result, which can be seen by combining [CT19, Theorem 6.3] and [Cal20, Theorem 2.21 & Corollary 4.3]: Cal20]). Let F be a continuous flow on a compact metric space X, and let φ : X → R be continuous.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 We could also define the class of one-sided λ-decompositions by taking the longest initial segment in B(η), declaring what is left over to be good, and setting S = ∅, or conversely by putting S = B(η) and P = ∅. This formalism is defined in [Cal20]: the decompositions in §9.2 are examples of one-sided λ-decompositions.…”
Section: Part III Geodesic Flowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The original result is for discrete-time systems. We state here a version of it for flows; the proof is given in [CT19a], and in more detail in [Cal20].…”
Section: Part III Geodesic Flowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is worth mentioning recent work of Call and Thompson[CT19,Cal20] that uses the specification approach to establish the K property, and even Bernoullicity in some cases.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%