2021
DOI: 10.2478/ebce-2021-0003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Kantian ethical perspective seen from the existential philosophy of Søren Kierkegaard’s Victor Eremita

Abstract: This article compares two groundings of ethics: the ethical postulates of Immanuel Kant with the existential thinking of S. Kierkegaard. To achieve this goal, first, it proposes highlighting the fundamental ideas of Kantian ethics; then, secondly, highlighting Kierkegaard’s ethical stance; and finally, contrasting both approaches to identify differences and similarities. Conclusively, we can say that the pure Kantian ethical formality of duty for duty’s sake necessarily dispenses with existential and concrete … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The output was interesting studies: [67,68]. The scholars from the Faculty of Central European Studies (UKF) participated in the tenth International Conference: The Future of Education-Virtual Edition, which was held in Florence (Italy) [69] and in the International Academic Conference: Education and Social Sciences, Business and Economics held in Belgrad (Serbia) [70][71][72].…”
Section: International Conferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The output was interesting studies: [67,68]. The scholars from the Faculty of Central European Studies (UKF) participated in the tenth International Conference: The Future of Education-Virtual Edition, which was held in Florence (Italy) [69] and in the International Academic Conference: Education and Social Sciences, Business and Economics held in Belgrad (Serbia) [70][71][72].…”
Section: International Conferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First of all, it is the understanding of otherness and difference. Others and otherness are viewed negatively in our civilizational paradigm (Martin et al, 2021). In the modernity paradigm, otherness is interpreted as a danger and threat rather than a call to dynamic cooperation.…”
Section: Sustainability Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The universally accepted idea of one good goal and a predetermined goal creates the conditions for a hierarchically ordered society dominated by those who decide what is good, they are helmsmen who lead others to the goal; they are teachers of wisdom. The task of passengers is to learn actions that will not cause damage to the ship, sink the ship, or deviate from the specified course (García Martín et al, 2021).…”
Section: Philosophical Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%