2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2015.07.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The key principles of optimal train control—Part 1: Formulation of the model, strategies of optimal type, evolutionary lines, location of optimal switching points

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
138
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 241 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
138
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The stochastic perturbations are added in the system dynamics (6). The maximum amplitude of the perturbation is assumed to be 1.…”
Section: Stochastic Perturbationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The stochastic perturbations are added in the system dynamics (6). The maximum amplitude of the perturbation is assumed to be 1.…”
Section: Stochastic Perturbationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the researches of automatic train control are mainly based on single-point model and multipoint model [6]. For single-point model, the whole high-speed train is simplified as a single rigid mass point, which ignores the coupling characteristics among the vehicles and the allocation of the distributed traction/brake force.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The expected speedholding operation is not perfectly realized; instead, it is approximated by a mixture of coast-power pairs and speedholding. It might be because that the speedholding corresponds to the singular arc of the train control problem given in Section 2 (Albrecht et al, 2015b;Howlett, 2000;Khmelnitsky, 2000;Liu and Golovitcher, 2003), and it has been known that the singular arc may not be perfectly estimated by the so-called direct method including RPM for solving the optimal control problems (Betts, 2010;Garg, 2011;Patterson and Rao, 2014;Rao et al, 2010). To obtain a high-accuracy speedholding operation by RPM, one may explicitly provide the singular arc conditions as path constraints (Betts, 2010;Patterson and Rao, 2014) in the original optimal control formulation.…”
Section: Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To obtain a high-accuracy speedholding operation by RPM, one may explicitly provide the singular arc conditions as path constraints (Betts, 2010;Patterson and Rao, 2014) in the original optimal control formulation. Regarding this, Howlett et al (2009) and Albrecht et al (2015bAlbrecht et al ( , 2015c have proposed explicit numerical methods that can be used to find the initial and final points of a singular speedholding phase; however, it requires and is worth further investigation in the future whether their method can be combined with RPM and help identify the speedholding phases under the complex settings in this paper with multiple trains and/or multiple nodes.…”
Section: Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation