The Keyword Effect: A Grounded Theory Study Exploring the Role of Keywords in Clinical Communication

Abstract

Objectives: Keywords, also known as "buzzwords" or "trigger words," serve as memorable descriptors to associate physical findings with specific diagnoses. These terms, such as "target lesion" and "steeple sign," liken a physical or radiographic finding to a nonmedical comparator as a means to elicit an associated diagnosis. Keywords permeate medical literature and clinical conversations. However, the potential for miscommunicating critical information exists and the impact of keywords on communication-related medical error is unknown. We explored the use of keywords and how physicians perceive their use in their clinical communication as part of patient care. Methods: With a grounded theory approach, semistructured interviews were completed in 2016 to 2017 with a purposive sample of 15 resident and attending physicians working in one pediatric emergency department, where clinical conversations occur frequently between providers of different specialties and levels of training. Constant comparative analysis for emergent themes was conducted. We identified key themes and examined their relationships to theorize how keywords affect clinical communication. Results: We identified three major aspects: 1) keywords belong to the culture of medicine, by which providers connect with each other using specialized terms that imply a shared experience and knowledge base. This culture encourages keyword use. 2) By encapsulating a pattern of clinical findings into one word or short phrases, keywords allow for convenient, efficient communication of both diagnoses and of thought processes between providers. 3) Keywords, however, may mislead; if incorrectly applied to a given clinical situation, they may be misinterpreted by the receiver, or they may introduce bias to diagnostic decision making. Conclusions: More than simple descriptors, keywords can communicate entire diagnoses and activate illness scripts between providers. Also, keywords are integral to the culture and language of medicine. However, providers should be aware of the potential negative effects of keywords in clinical conversations and must balance the demands of efficient and accurate communication with the potential for miscommunication and error. K eywords, also known as "buzzwords" or "trigger words," are terms used as memorable descriptors to associate physical findings with specific diagnoses. These descriptors, such as "butterfly rash," "honey-colored crust," and "hot-potato voice," liken a physical or radiographic finding to a nonmedical comparator and are closely associated with a single diagnosis (Table 1). While keywords permeate medical literature and daily clinical conversations, these terms may lead to medical errors due to their associative properties, contributing to cognitive bias or misdiagnoses based on false assumptions. 1-3 In addition, keywords may contribute

Saliva-based detection of SARS-CoV-2: a bibliometric analysis of global research

“…Because keywords are highlighted summaries of the literature topic and content, the frequency and centrality of keywords generally reflect the intensity of a certain topic that researchers may be concerned with or aim to address in the research field [ 39 ]. The keyword cooccurrence map showed that SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19, saliva, and coronavirus were the most frequent and established extensive links to other keywords (Fig.…”

Analysis of research hotspots in COVID-19 genomics based on citespace software: Bibliometric analysis

“…Keywords were manually merged and deleted, such as changing covid-19 to covid 19, and changing sar, sars, virus, coronavirus, infection, respiratory syndrome coronavirus to sars-cov-2. Keywords are high-level summaries of literature content and topics, which could diagnose and activate disease scripts and are an integral part of medical culture and language ( Chan and Eppich, 2020 ). T The results show that research hotspots in the field of COVID-19 genomics mainly focus on covid 19, SRAS-COV-2, protein, RNA, ace2, replication, vaccine, expression, spike protein, transmission, and so on.…”

Automated Item Generation: – Impact of item variants on performance and standard setting

“…3), where student performance is hypothesised to be related to the use of the phrase 'loin to groin' which acts as a buzzword for renal colic. In support of this hypothesis, Chan and Eppich (2020) found that doctors equated keywords (or buzzwords) with studying for undergraduate medical examinations and one of the participants in their study, a junior doctor said '…when we're rst learning clinical medicine, a lot of the patterns that we recognise are in speci c phrases' (Chan and Eppich, 2020). They concluded that keywords can communicate entire diagnoses and activate illness scripts independently of any other information.…”