The Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes website: Comparison of guidelines as a tool for harmonization

Abstract

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a worldwide public health problem with significant comorbidity and mortality. Improving quality of life and survival of CKD patients necessitates a large number of preventive and therapeutic interventions. To resolve these issues several organizations have developed guidelines, which are difficult to compare comprehensively. The Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes website at http://kdigo.org compares five major guidelines. The section 'compare guidelines' covers 41 topics distributed over five major subjects: (1) general clinics; (2) hemodialysis (HD); (3) vascular access for HD; (4) peritoneal dialysis; and (5) chemistries. The tables compare guideline recommendations and the evidence levels on which they are based, with direct links to each of the guidelines. These data show that the different guideline groups tend to propose similar targets, but that nuances in the guideline statements, their rationale, and grading of evidence levels present some discrepancies, although most guidelines are based on the same literature. We conclude that there is an urgent need to harmonize existing guidelines, and for a global initiative to avoid the parallel development of conflicting guidelines on the same topics. The tables displayed on the website offer a basis for structuring this process, a procedure which has recently been initiated by a body composed of the five guideline development groups.

High-content affinity-based proteomics: unlocking protein biomarker discovery

“…Similarly, kidney dialysis for people with failed kidneys is performed so as to remove those small molecules that build up in the blood when the GFR is reduced. Various estimates of the molecular weight required for filtration have been made over the years, with normal filtration occurring for molecules at or below 30,000 Da [86,87].…”

Chronic Kidney Disease-Related Mineral and Bone Disorders

“…This table has been built following the same structure as the report by KDIGO [4] and updated with the recent CARI and UK CPGs.…”

Practice Guidelines Do Improve Patient Outcomes: Association or Causation?

“…Obviously, the methodology used to develop them, the importance of the area addressed and the ability of guideline to impact on populations, costs and practice affects whether or the guideline can impact outcomes [22,23] .…”