1983
DOI: 10.1086/160757
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The kinematic properties of faint elliptical galaxies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

48
426
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 518 publications
(475 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
48
426
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One of these is the M BH -s relation (Ferrarese & Merritt 2000;Gebhardt et al 2000), which can be described with a single power law (M BH 5 6 s µ -) over a wide range in velocity dispersion (70 350 km s 1 --, e.g., Graham et al 2011;McConnell et al 2011;. The other is the L sph -s relation, which has long been known to be a "double power law," with L sph 5 6 s µ -at the luminous end 5 (Schechter 1980;Malumuth & Kirshner 1981;Lauer et al 2007b;von der Linden et al 2007;Liu et al 2008)and L sph 2 s µ at intermediate and faint luminosities (Davies et al 1983;Held et al 1992;de Rijcke et al 2005;Matković & Guzmán 2005;Balcells et al 2007;Chilingarian et al 2008;Forbes et al 2008;Cody et al 2009;Tortora et al 2009 When Graham (2012) pointed out this overlooked inconsistency between these linear and bent relations, he identified two different populations of galaxies, namely the core-Sérsic spheroids Trujillo et al 2004) and the Sérsic spheroids 6 , and attributed the change in slope (from super-quadratic to linear) to their different formation mechanisms. In this scenario, core-Sérsic spheroids are built in dry merger events where the black hole and the bulge grow at the same pace, increasing their mass in lock steps (M L BH sph 1 µ ), whereas Sérsic spheroids originate from gas-rich processes in which the mass of the black hole increases more rapidly than the mass of its host spheroid (M L BH sph 2.5 µ ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of these is the M BH -s relation (Ferrarese & Merritt 2000;Gebhardt et al 2000), which can be described with a single power law (M BH 5 6 s µ -) over a wide range in velocity dispersion (70 350 km s 1 --, e.g., Graham et al 2011;McConnell et al 2011;. The other is the L sph -s relation, which has long been known to be a "double power law," with L sph 5 6 s µ -at the luminous end 5 (Schechter 1980;Malumuth & Kirshner 1981;Lauer et al 2007b;von der Linden et al 2007;Liu et al 2008)and L sph 2 s µ at intermediate and faint luminosities (Davies et al 1983;Held et al 1992;de Rijcke et al 2005;Matković & Guzmán 2005;Balcells et al 2007;Chilingarian et al 2008;Forbes et al 2008;Cody et al 2009;Tortora et al 2009 When Graham (2012) pointed out this overlooked inconsistency between these linear and bent relations, he identified two different populations of galaxies, namely the core-Sérsic spheroids Trujillo et al 2004) and the Sérsic spheroids 6 , and attributed the change in slope (from super-quadratic to linear) to their different formation mechanisms. In this scenario, core-Sérsic spheroids are built in dry merger events where the black hole and the bulge grow at the same pace, increasing their mass in lock steps (M L BH sph 1 µ ), whereas Sérsic spheroids originate from gas-rich processes in which the mass of the black hole increases more rapidly than the mass of its host spheroid (M L BH sph 2.5 µ ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Davies et al (1983) studied the now classical V max /σ o versus diagram for spheroids (Illingworth 1977;Binney 1978), where V max is the maximum of the lineof-sight (l.o.s.) rotation curve, σ o is the central l.o.s.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ever since the seminal study by Davies et al (1983), it has been known that elliptical galaxies can be divided in two distinct classes. The bright ellipticals gener-(M B [ [20.5) ally have a boxy appearance, are pressure supported, and often show some form of radio and/or X-ray activity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%