1987
DOI: 10.1007/bf00878033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The kinematics of gouge deformation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

46
386
3
4

Year Published

1997
1997
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 588 publications
(439 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
46
386
3
4
Order By: Relevance
“…[1993]. The distribution in the gouge and breccia from the Lopez Canyon fault from Sammis et al [1987] is also shown for comparison. Note the fall-off in particle density for the larger particles in the sample adjacent to the fault core.…”
Section: Nearest Neighbor Model For Fragmentation During Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[1993]. The distribution in the gouge and breccia from the Lopez Canyon fault from Sammis et al [1987] is also shown for comparison. Note the fall-off in particle density for the larger particles in the sample adjacent to the fault core.…”
Section: Nearest Neighbor Model For Fragmentation During Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gouge and breccia is generally non-cohesive, usually shows no sign of significant shear strain, and also tends to have a power-law size distribution, but with a mass dimension closer to D 2 = 1.6 [Sammis et al, 1987]. Particle distributions in cataclasite and gouge are compared in Figure 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Relative particle abundances were determined according to the following power law relationship [e.g., Sammis et al, 1986Sammis et al, , 1987 …”
Section: Design Of Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This shows quantitatively the gradient of anisotropy from the gouge material inside the fault to the much more anisotropic peripheral fractured zones. This result highlights the differences between fracture and fragmentation processes: while fractures are initiated locally under tension (mode I) with opening much smaller than fracture length, i.e., characterized by a strong anisotropy, fragmentation under shear is a complex multiscale process involving friction, grain rotation and comminution (e.g., [11][12][13][14]) that leads to relatively isotropic grain shapes. The present analysis clearly reveals this transition from one mechanism to another across the fault plane.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%