1974
DOI: 10.1179/cmq.1974.13.3.423
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The kinetics of dissolution of covellite in acidified ferric sulphate solutions

Abstract: Pure synthetic CuS disks and high-grade natural covellite were dissolved in acidified ferric sulphate solutions in the temperature range 25 to 95°C. For both materials, the rates were relatively slow and increased during the initial stages of the dissolution, eventually becoming nearly linear. The activation energy, as determined from the initial dissolution rates of the synthetic covellite, was 17.8 ± 2.0 kcal/mole. Microscopic examination of both the natural and the synthetic sulphide revealed that the attac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
15
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
6
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CuS can be leached with ferric sulfate (Fe 2 (SO 4 ) 3 ), an operation encountered in copper ore processing (a/o CuS) (Peacey et al, 2004;Dutrizac and MacDonald, 1974). Copper sulfate, elemental sulfur (S o ), and ferrous sulfate (FeSO 4 ) are produced in this process:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CuS can be leached with ferric sulfate (Fe 2 (SO 4 ) 3 ), an operation encountered in copper ore processing (a/o CuS) (Peacey et al, 2004;Dutrizac and MacDonald, 1974). Copper sulfate, elemental sulfur (S o ), and ferrous sulfate (FeSO 4 ) are produced in this process:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The activation energy of E A = 22.0 kJ/mol derived in this study is lower than activation energies reported in previous studies. 6,11,12 It seems plausible that the dissolution reaction in this study was controlled by diffusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This observation is in agreement with Thomas and Ingraham 11 and Dutrizac and MacDonald. 6 Thomas and Ingraham 11 reported that Fe 2+ to Cu 2+ molar ratios did not exceed 2.1:1. Dutrizac and MacDonald 6 reported that Fe 2+ to Cu 2+ molar ratios ranged from 2.07 to 2.53.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations