The Knowledge and Perceptions of Florida Pharmacists in Administering Inactivated Influenza Vaccines to Pregnant Women

Abstract

Background: Influenza vaccine rates in pregnant women remain suboptimal despite the recommendations from healthcare organizations. Though pharmacists can provide immunization services as a result of the standing order, few studies have examined the role of the pharmacist in providing immunization to pregnant women or explored their perspective on their role in providing influenza vaccines among pregnant women. Purpose: This study explored the perceptions and knowledge of Florida pharmacists in administering inactivated influenza vaccines (IIV) to pregnant women. Methods: Semi-structured in-depth interviews guided by the theory of planned behavior were conducted with 18 licensed Florida pharmacists, including clinical and retail pharmacists. A thematic analysis was conducted. Results: The majority of pharmacists (94%) were knowledgeable about the IIV in pregnant women. Participants expressed mixed attitudes, identified barriers and facilitators, and subjective norms influencing vaccine administration in pregnant women. Participants expressed the importance of trust and how that influenced vaccine uptake. Participants also expressed their position not to only provide immunization services but also to counsel and educate patients. Conclusion: There is a need to strengthen immunization services, provided by pharmacists to more individuals, including high-risk groups such as pregnant women.

Models of determinants of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in non-pregnant and pregnant population: Review of current literature”

“…The TPB has been used as a tool to assess vaccine hesitancy in a multitude of vaccinations globally. The TPB has been used to evaluate general and childhood vaccine hesitancy in Italy, 82 China, 83 Canada, 84 and the United States; 85 influenza vaccination in the United States; 74 , 86–88 HPV vaccination in the United States; 41 , 89 Hepatitis B vaccination in Uganda; 66 Swine Flu vaccination in the United Kingdom; 90 the Boostrix-IPV vaccination in the United Kingdom; 91 and COVID-19 vaccination in the United States, 46 , 92 Bangladesh, 54–56 Ireland, 93 New Zealand, 94 Pakistan, 95 and Malta. 96 While this list is not conclusive, it begins to illustrate the versatility and usability of the TPB.…”

Vaccine promotion strategies in community pharmacy addressing vulnerable populations: a scoping review

“…Pharmacies also saw increased prescription revenue through the initiative as an indirect benefit Health communication campaign targeting parents through increased knowledge, awareness (poster, social media, leaflet, personalized letter) and culturally relevant material Facilitator: collaboration with public health and pharmacy banner, culturally relevant material. The intervention addressed common barriers: cost, convenience and receiving a strong vaccine recommendation 2 Falope et al [ 29 ] b 2021 Qualitative: semi-structured interview Explore the knowledge and perceptions of Florida pharmacists administering vaccine USA Influenza Pregnant women Participants were knowledgeable about the influenza vaccine and its indication in pregnancy. Most pharmacists displayed a positive attitude towards various aspects of vaccination (access, expertise, increased scope of practice and ease of practice).…”

“…Pharmacy technicians can contribute in bridging the discussion between pharmacy services and vaccination, keeping track of vaccination refusal and assisting in administrative tasks (documenting vaccines in the immunization records, collecting patient history, preparing the billing…). Eight articles (13%) also underlined the key role of pharmacy technicians in initiating the conversation about vaccination with eligible patients or referring to the pharmacist for further questions [ 29 , 36 , 42 , 44 , 64 , 66 , 69 , 85 ].…”

Application of behavioural theories, models, and frameworks in pharmacy practice research based on published evidence: a scoping review

“…Multiple justifications were reported for the use of theories/ models/frameworks however, reporting was inconsistent, for example multiple studies simply mentioned that the theory/ model/framework guided the development of the data collection tool [32,[37][38][39][40][41][42]. Beyond this, 14 studies provided a description of the theory/model/framework constructs and/ or assumptions but without connecting it to the research question [28,[43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55]. Nine studies provided the justification that the theory/model/framework had been used previously in similar research or within the same field [27,30,33,[56][57][58][59][60][61].…”