2005
DOI: 10.1155/ijmms.2005.2749
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Kreps‐Yan theorem for L

Abstract: We prove the following version of the Kreps-Yan theorem. For any norm-closed convex conethere exists a strictly positive continuous linear functional, whose restriction on C is nonpositive. The technique of the proof differs from the usual approach, applicable to a weakly Lindelöf Banach space.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Lemma 3 in the case X = L ∞ (P) is proved in [7, Lemma 2.5]. We should note that this claim is true also for a cone C that is not closed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lemma 3 in the case X = L ∞ (P) is proved in [7, Lemma 2.5]. We should note that this claim is true also for a cone C that is not closed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The general strategy of the proof follows [7] whose arguments are adjusted to L ∞ . We prove first the existence of a strictly positive element f ∈ X bounded above on {x ∈ C : x − ≤ 1} (Lemma 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of the existence of an unconditional basic sequence in a Banach space is also quoted in this section independently from the results provided in [8], as an important condition for the extraction of results concerning FTAP. This condition is not irrelevant to ( [9], Th. 1.1), about Lindelöf Properties of weak topology, but here it mainly concerns the construction of a Strictly Positive Projection Operator.…”
Section: Some Remarks On Previous Work About the Fundamental Asset Prmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Thus, to look for finitely additive EMM's seems to make sense; see Berti et al (2013Berti et al ( , 2014a, Cassese (2007), Rokhlin (2005) and Rokhlin and Schachermayer (2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%