2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2004.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The laboratory assessment of enamel erosion: a review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
125
0
26

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(152 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
1
125
0
26
Order By: Relevance
“…28 In this study, we decided to perform enamel microhardness measurements because they are the most useful method to assess enamel softening. 29 In addition, this quantitative method is simple, inexpensive, and easily applied, 30 and consists in measuring the resistance of a substrate to indentation, which can involve Vickers (tetra-pyramidal) or Knoop (rhomboid) measures. 28 Knoop microhardness was chosen in this experiment because it is considered more sensitive to changes in the surface layer of an erosive lesion 27 than other microhardness tests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 In this study, we decided to perform enamel microhardness measurements because they are the most useful method to assess enamel softening. 29 In addition, this quantitative method is simple, inexpensive, and easily applied, 30 and consists in measuring the resistance of a substrate to indentation, which can involve Vickers (tetra-pyramidal) or Knoop (rhomboid) measures. 28 Knoop microhardness was chosen in this experiment because it is considered more sensitive to changes in the surface layer of an erosive lesion 27 than other microhardness tests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hardness measured by indenta-tion is affected not only by the immediate surrounding, but also by changes of the material in a distance of approximately 10 times the dimensions of the indentation. To limit the impact of surrounding material changes, microindenta-tions for determining erosive alterations of the superficial surfaces are per-formed with low pressure of about 50 g (0.49 N) [ 2 5 , 2 6 ] [23,24]. Nevertheless, one should be aware that microhardness measurements do not reflect the properties of the surface only.…”
Section: Surface Hardness Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An electron beam hitting the surface leads to excitement of atoms resulting in emitting of X-rays which may provide information about distribution of various elements, such as calcium, phosphate and carbon with a concentration of about 1 wt%. However, suitability of the method for evaluating erosive processes has not been clearly demonstrated as yet [23] [21]. Both SEM and ESEM are suitable for use with native surfaces.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A diode laser beam is reflected from the back of the cantilever and is incident on a four-segment photodiode. As the tip moves, the deflection of the cantilever is indicated by the position of the laser on the photodiode, thus constructing a map of the sample surface [23] [21]. The tip can move over the sample in dynamic modes with an oscil-lating tip moving up and down in either tapping mode (with touching surface contacts) or noncontact mode.…”
Section: Atomic Force Microscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, microhardness measurements such as the Knoop procedure allow discriminating different erosive potentials of various substances on dental hard tissue, even after short exposures (3 min) to acidic agents [27] [25]. In other studies, immersion periods of at least 20 min were chosen to investigate the impact on surface hard-ness [28] [29] [30] [23,26,27]. By means of the indentations on enamel surfaces detection of enamel abrasion is also possible by calculating the depth of the indentations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%