2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cancergen.2015.03.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The lack of E318K MITF germline mutation in Latvian melanoma patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies were conducted on a mixture of hereditary and sporadic melanoma populations. A few studies identified a relationship of this variant with renal cell carcinoma (RCC), pancreatic cancer, and pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma 2,4,10 . Bertolotto et al identified over a fivefold increased risk for carriers to develop RCC, melanoma, or both cancers in 829 patients (OR 5.55; 95% CI 2.59-12.91; p = 1.2E−6) and identified a fivefold risk of developing RCC only in 164 "genetically-enriched" patients who were wild-type for RCC-predisposing genes (OR 5.19; 95% CI 1.37-16.87; p = 0.008) 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Studies were conducted on a mixture of hereditary and sporadic melanoma populations. A few studies identified a relationship of this variant with renal cell carcinoma (RCC), pancreatic cancer, and pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma 2,4,10 . Bertolotto et al identified over a fivefold increased risk for carriers to develop RCC, melanoma, or both cancers in 829 patients (OR 5.55; 95% CI 2.59-12.91; p = 1.2E−6) and identified a fivefold risk of developing RCC only in 164 "genetically-enriched" patients who were wild-type for RCC-predisposing genes (OR 5.19; 95% CI 1.37-16.87; p = 0.008) 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meta-analysis of the data compiled from nine published studies (n = 331) 1 10 demonstrated that the variant was significantly correlated with melanoma (Fig. 1 ; odds ratio (OR) 2.37; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.89–2.97; p < 1E−5; I 2= 19%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations