The lack of public health research output from India

Abstract

BackgroundSystematic assessment of recent health research output from India, and its relation with the estimated disease burden, is not available. This information would help understand the areas in health research that need improvement in India to enhance the health of India's population.MethodsThe health research output from India during 2002, which was accessible in the public domain, was assessed by searching PubMed and other internet health literature databases, and was related to the disease burden suggested by the Global Burden of Disease Study. The main outcome measures were number of health papers with abstracts in basic, clinical and public health sciences; quality-adjusted research output based on the impact factors of journals in which the papers were published; classification of papers in disease/condition categories and comparison of research output with the estimated disease burden in each category. Comparison of the health papers from India during 2002 included in PubMed was done with those from Australia during one quarter of 2002.ResultsOf the 4876 health papers from India in 2002 in PubMed, 48.4%, 47.1% and 4.4% were in basic, clinical and public health sciences, respectively. Of the 4495 papers based on original research, only 3.3% were in public health. Quality-adjusted original research output was highest for non-communicable diseases (62% of total). Of the total quality-adjusted original research output, the proportions in injuries (0.7%), cardiovascular diseases (3.6%), respiratory infections (0.2%), diarrhoeal diseases (1.9%), perinatal conditions (0.4%), childhood cluster diseases (0.5%), unipolar major depression (0%), and HIV/AIDS (1.5%) were substantially lower than their proportional contribution to the disease burden in India. Human resources, health policy, health economics, and impact assessment of interventions were particularly poorly represented in public health research. The Australia-India ratio for quality-adjusted health research output per unit gross domestic product was 20 and for public health research output was 31.ConclusionsGood-quality public health research output from India is grossly inadequate, and strategic planning to improve it is necessary if substantial enhancement of population health were to be made possible. There is inordinately low relative research output in several diseases/conditions that cause major disease burden in India.

Multi-Virulence-Locus Sequence Typing of 4bListeria monocytogenesIsolates Obtained from Different Sources in India over a 10-Year Period

“…Listeriosis has been reported in sporadic, outbreak, and epidemic forms across many countries; however, data are lacking from developing countries such as India (Dandona et al, 2004;Reddy, 2006;Dandona et al, 2009). The absence of such data impedes epidemiological studies, which could otherwise be employed to control the spread of L. monocytogenes in developing countries.…”

Problem-based learning in dentistry and interfiled comparison: a citation analysis study

“…Dandona et al [7] conducted a study on the health research output. They concluded that both the magnitude and distribution of research output were not commensurate with the disease profile and burden.…”

Clinical health research in India: is there a way forward?

“…[7] Dandona et al have out forward the concept of demand, supply, and environment for pushing research in India. [8] This may be the way forward. We cannot and should not regard research as the poor cousin of medicine.…”

“…Establishing and encouraging medical schools/ institutions to develop and train quality scientists should be regarded as a priority. [8] India today has a surprisingly few number of medical scientists. Medical and paramedical colleges should be encouraged to adopt a more hands-on investigative thinking culture in their teaching syllabus, as currently it is so theoretical that it rarely inspires enthusiasm in young professionals towards health research.…”