2005
DOI: 10.1080/01443410500041318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The lack of representation of educational psychology and school psychology in introductory psychology textbooks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is not much evidence to suggest whether psychology departments are adequately informing students about the graduate specialization areas of psychology, especially school psychology, nor about the potential for careers in the various areas of psychology. Some have asserted that exposure to school psychology in undergraduate psychology education is minimal (Leong & Poynter, ; Lucas, Blazek, Raley, & Washington, ; Miller & Gentile, ). Yet, when Gilman and Handwerk () examined knowledge of clinical, school, and other psychology specializations in undergraduate students from psychology, education, and other majors, they found that, in general, undergraduates across all majors reported slightly higher knowledge of school psychology than clinical psychology.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is not much evidence to suggest whether psychology departments are adequately informing students about the graduate specialization areas of psychology, especially school psychology, nor about the potential for careers in the various areas of psychology. Some have asserted that exposure to school psychology in undergraduate psychology education is minimal (Leong & Poynter, ; Lucas, Blazek, Raley, & Washington, ; Miller & Gentile, ). Yet, when Gilman and Handwerk () examined knowledge of clinical, school, and other psychology specializations in undergraduate students from psychology, education, and other majors, they found that, in general, undergraduates across all majors reported slightly higher knowledge of school psychology than clinical psychology.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior investigations of coverage of applied fields have focused on single specializations (Maynard, Geberth, & Joseph, 2002;Wise, 1981) or a comparison of two specializations (Lucas, Blazek, Raley, & Washington, 2005), or have sampled only a subset of introductory texts (Dixon et al, 1997). It is difficult to compare the results of previous studies concerning coverage because of different methods and materials.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This framework was recently adapted to examine career decisions within school psychology. Although SCCT is a complex framework, with numerous constructs, most scholars within school psychology have focused on four primary constructs, those being learning experiences, self‐efficacy, outcome expectations, and choice‐intentions (e.g., Bocanegra, Gubi, & Cappaert, ; Graves & Wright, ; Lucas et al, ). Learning experiences are experiences throughout a person's life that inform them about possible career paths.…”
Section: Social Cognitive Career Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The handful of studies that have been conducted have found school psychology to be underrepresented in undergraduate psychology textbooks and coursework (Haselhuhn & Clopton, ; Lucas, Blazek, Raley, & Washington, ). Furthermore, scholars have generally found that undergraduate psychology students have less exposure to and knowledge of school psychology than other professional psychology sub‐fields (i.e., counseling psychology, clinical psychology; Bocanegra, Gubi, Fan, & Hansmann, ; Lucas et al, ) and that students who reported greater knowledge and exposure also reported greater intentions of entering the school psychology profession (Bocanegra et al, ). It is important to note that this previous research has been correlational, as opposed to experimental, and has not examined whether participants later applied to a school psychology program.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%