1993
DOI: 10.1159/000156682
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Lacrimal Fossa of Cercopithecoidea, with Special Reference to Cladistic Analysis of Old World Monkey Relationships

Abstract: Re-examination of lacrimal fossa patterns in extant cercopithecoids indicates that the last common ancestor of Cercopithecini and Papionini, and hence of Cercopithecinae, probably retained a maxillary contribution to the lacrimal fossa, as did the common ancestor of Colobinae. Consequently, the presence of a maxilla-lacrimal fossa cannot be used to assess the subfamily affinity of Old World monkeys. In addition to being correlated with general facial lengthening, the derived, exclusively lacrimal pattern of Er… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5a, b). The lacrimal fossa is in line with the medial orbital margin, as in extant hylobatids and Victoriapithecus, rather than being clearly within the orbit as in Pan and Gorilla, or clearly anterior to the orbital margin as commonly seen in Aegyptopithecus 9 . Nasion is located about a third of the way down between the levels of the inferior and superior orbital margins.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…5a, b). The lacrimal fossa is in line with the medial orbital margin, as in extant hylobatids and Victoriapithecus, rather than being clearly within the orbit as in Pan and Gorilla, or clearly anterior to the orbital margin as commonly seen in Aegyptopithecus 9 . Nasion is located about a third of the way down between the levels of the inferior and superior orbital margins.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The classification of the Cercopithecidae by Strasser and Delson (1987) is used at and above the (sub-) generic level and with a few minor modifications. Table 1 shows the data for the skeletal composition of the lacrimal fossa of the Old World monkeys observed in this study as well as the data from Benefit and McCrossin (1993), which are entered separately in the table because of the different sampling procedures (Green et al, 1980;Korey, 1980;Mouri, 1988). Benefit and McCrossin (1993) sort the lacrimal fossae into three patterns, that is, the maxillalacrimal (M-L), the intermediate (Int), and the exclusively lacrimal (Lac).…”
Section: Allmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 shows the data for the skeletal composition of the lacrimal fossa of the Old World monkeys observed in this study as well as the data from Benefit and McCrossin (1993), which are entered separately in the table because of the different sampling procedures (Green et al, 1980;Korey, 1980;Mouri, 1988). Benefit and McCrossin (1993) sort the lacrimal fossae into three patterns, that is, the maxillalacrimal (M-L), the intermediate (Int), and the exclusively lacrimal (Lac). While an individual L-LF of the present study can safely be considered to agree with the Lac of Benefit and McCrossin (1993), the procedure to convert the two observations on both sides of a cranium into a single characterization of the cranium, M-L, Int, or Lac, is not explicitly described by Benefit and McCrossin (1993).…”
Section: Allmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations