APPENDIX
A.1. Results on the Party IdentificationWE EXPLORE PARTY IDENTIFICATION of the parliament members in 1912 as another check on ideology. Compared with the other parties-the Republican Party (Kunghotang) and the Democratic Party (Minzhutang)-the KMT (Kuomintang literally means "Chinese Nationalist Party") was known to be more radical and more pro-redistribution (Chang (1985)). In contrast, the party ideology of the Kunghotang was based on Jean-Jacques Rousseau's The Social Contract, whereas the Minzhutang emphasized that stability was their primary goal.We link quotas per capita to the parliament members' party identification in 1912, using the following cross-sectional specification:where KMT i p is a dummy indicating whether a party member i belongs to the Kuomintang or not.The results are presented in columns (1)- (2) in Table A.V. Among the 703 party members for whom we can identify the origins and ages, 434 were identified with the KMT. Based on the individual-level information, we do not find any significant impact of quotas per capita on party identification. However, consistent with the hypothesis that the KMT was more radical, we find that younger people were more likely to identify themselves as KMT members.Columns (3)- (8) report the results using prefecture-level information to examine the link between the quotas and the number of party members. As is shown, quotas per capita increased the party member probability for both the KMT and the other parties. This finding is expected because more revolutionaries should be associated with a higher probability of party members after the success of the revolution. However, the magnitudes of the impacts for the KMT and the other parties are not significantly different. Consistent with the placebo test using the Boxer Rebellion, the finding on party identification once