1993
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4612-4376-2_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Language Code: Issues in Word Recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These include the ability to recognize words directly on a visual basis (Backman, Bruck, Hebert, & Seidenberg, 1984); the ability to use familiar orthographic sequences to access the lexicon without phonological mediation (Stanovich, 1993); the knowledge of permissible letter patterns (Perfetti, 1984) and lexical knowledge (Juel, Griffith, & Gough, 1986). Studies have shown that orthographic skills is strongly related to reading measures at word and text levels in alphabetic languages (e.g., Barker, Torgesen, & Wagner, 1992;Golf, Pratt, & Ong, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…These include the ability to recognize words directly on a visual basis (Backman, Bruck, Hebert, & Seidenberg, 1984); the ability to use familiar orthographic sequences to access the lexicon without phonological mediation (Stanovich, 1993); the knowledge of permissible letter patterns (Perfetti, 1984) and lexical knowledge (Juel, Griffith, & Gough, 1986). Studies have shown that orthographic skills is strongly related to reading measures at word and text levels in alphabetic languages (e.g., Barker, Torgesen, & Wagner, 1992;Golf, Pratt, & Ong, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Empirical evidence consistently supports the conclusion that phonemic awareness is signi cantly related to beginning reading achievement (Snider, 1995). Stanovich (1994) concluded that a ''7-minute phonological awareness test will predict ease of initial reading acquisition better than a 2-hour intelligence test!'' (p. 284).…”
Section: The Phonem Ic Awareness Factormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is therefore necessary to distinguish between different levels of abstraction in phonological processing which correspond to the different levels of competence and involve the type of processing and the nature and size of the processed units (Morais, Alegria, & Content, 1987;Lundberg & Hoien, 1991;Stanovich, 1993). Morais (1991) distinguishes between four levels of phonological awareness: the knowledge of the phonological sequences which allow children to identify intonation, the rhymes that form spoken words irrespective of their meaning, syllabic awareness and, finally, phonemic awareness which corresponds to the highest level of abstraction since the identification of phonemes is based on the establishment of a relationship between the lexical units of the language (minimal pairs) and not on the properties of the sound stimulus.…”
Section: Phonological Skills: Diversity and Underlying Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could explain the different ages at which the segmentation units of a language are mastered. The term "phonological sensitivity" could enable us to encompass the continuum between simple phonological processing and more complex processing operations (Hempenstall, 1997) or between superficial and more profound levels of sensitivity (Stanovich, 1993).…”
Section: The Distinction Between the Epiphonological And Metaphonologmentioning
confidence: 99%