Learning, Work and Practice: New Understandings 2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-4759-3_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Language of Knowledge Generation in Practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Heidegger's essay ( The Age of the World Picture) includes the following three related concerns: a) the loss of the ontological difference between Being and beings; b) the metaphysical basis of our thought and its very nature; and c) the contemporary process by which the world becomes an object of representation and the human being becomes a subject who makes only representations. Regarding the first point, according to Flint (), it is important to remember that Heidegger presents not only the well‐known ontological difference between Being and beings but also a tripartite distinction between Being, beings and the meaning of Being:
The question of the meaning of being is also one that is often passed over in readings of Heidegger's () Being and Time […]. In fact, Heidegger () draws out not just an ontological difference between beings and being, but a tripartite distinction involving the meaning of being.
…”
Section: Heidegger and Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Heidegger's essay ( The Age of the World Picture) includes the following three related concerns: a) the loss of the ontological difference between Being and beings; b) the metaphysical basis of our thought and its very nature; and c) the contemporary process by which the world becomes an object of representation and the human being becomes a subject who makes only representations. Regarding the first point, according to Flint (), it is important to remember that Heidegger presents not only the well‐known ontological difference between Being and beings but also a tripartite distinction between Being, beings and the meaning of Being:
The question of the meaning of being is also one that is often passed over in readings of Heidegger's () Being and Time […]. In fact, Heidegger () draws out not just an ontological difference between beings and being, but a tripartite distinction involving the meaning of being.
…”
Section: Heidegger and Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this tripartite distinction, meaning is that which constitutes what is understood (Heidegger , 193 [152]) […] ‘giving it an axis around which it can organise itself’. So, meaning signifies the ‘upon which’ of a primary projection in terms of which an issue […] can be conceived in its possibilities as that which it is (Flint, , p. 141).…”
Section: Heidegger and Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%