2002
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9639.00080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Language of Statistics

Abstract: Summary The discussion of problems associated with the use of language, specifically vocabulary and symbolism, is extended from the teaching and learning of mathematics to the particular area of statistics.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the first steps in addressing lexical ambiguity in the classroom is for instructors to recognize words that have lexical ambiguity and try to preempt difficulties by careful use of language in their teaching (Rangecroft 2002;Albert 2003;Brown and Spang 2008;Lesser and Winsor 2009). In addition, instructors should be aware of students' everyday use of lexically ambiguous words and should address explicitly in the classroom the differences in meaning (Rangecroft 2002;Brown and Spang 2008;Lavy and Mashiach-Eizenberg 2009), through the use of multiples modes and representations (Brown and Spang 2008;Lesser et al 2009Lesser et al , 2013, and by exploiting the differences between the uses (Adams et al 2005). Instructors should help students to build their voices in the technical domain (Lemke 1990;Durkin and Shire 1991a;Adams et al 2005;Brown and Spang 2008) through vocabulary activities and writing assignments (Durkin and Shire 1991a;Adams et al 2005;Lesser et al 2009Lesser et al , 2013.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the first steps in addressing lexical ambiguity in the classroom is for instructors to recognize words that have lexical ambiguity and try to preempt difficulties by careful use of language in their teaching (Rangecroft 2002;Albert 2003;Brown and Spang 2008;Lesser and Winsor 2009). In addition, instructors should be aware of students' everyday use of lexically ambiguous words and should address explicitly in the classroom the differences in meaning (Rangecroft 2002;Brown and Spang 2008;Lavy and Mashiach-Eizenberg 2009), through the use of multiples modes and representations (Brown and Spang 2008;Lesser et al 2009Lesser et al , 2013, and by exploiting the differences between the uses (Adams et al 2005). Instructors should help students to build their voices in the technical domain (Lemke 1990;Durkin and Shire 1991a;Adams et al 2005;Brown and Spang 2008) through vocabulary activities and writing assignments (Durkin and Shire 1991a;Adams et al 2005;Lesser et al 2009Lesser et al , 2013.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If an interpreter lacks knowledge of discipline-specific language, this may cause issues with conveying the concept, especially when the term has a different common meaning. For example, in statistics the word "significant" can be confusing due to its multiple meanings (Rangecroft, 2002). Students may already be aware of the common meaning (important); fewer have seen its appearance in a mathematical or scientific context (significant figures), which still differs from its statistical meaning (data that are unlikely to occur by chance).…”
Section: Project Thinking Cap: Communication Access and Persistence Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the role of language in the teaching and learning of mathematics is now well established in the literature (Bay-Williams & Herrera, 2007;Clarkson, 2007;Hoffert, 2009;Moschkovich, 2007;Planas & Civil, 2013), there have been a few research studies about language issues in learning statistics (Kaplan, Fisher, & Rogness, 2009;Lavy & Mashiach-Eizenberg, 2009;Parke, 2008;Rangecroft, 2002) but these did not involve English Language Learners.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%