1988
DOI: 10.3233/asy-1988-1202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Laplace operator on the nth tensor power of a line bundle: eigenvalues which are uniformly bounded in n

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
85
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
85
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in fact a more natural generalization of the Kähler situation then it might seem. By the results of [10] and our Theorem 4.2, the first d k eigenvalues of ∆ • k can be bounded independently of k, while the rest of the spectrum drifts to the right with a gap of O(k). So as k → ∞ the first d k eigenvalues (which are zero in the integrable case) remain within some fixed interval around zero even in the non-integrable case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is in fact a more natural generalization of the Kähler situation then it might seem. By the results of [10] and our Theorem 4.2, the first d k eigenvalues of ∆ • k can be bounded independently of k, while the rest of the spectrum drifts to the right with a gap of O(k). So as k → ∞ the first d k eigenvalues (which are zero in the integrable case) remain within some fixed interval around zero even in the non-integrable case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Let Π k : L 2 (X, L ⊗k ) → H k be the orthogonal projection. Then [10] shows that the Π k are the components of a projector of Szegö type. That is, they define a generalized Toeplitz structure in the sense of [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [11] it was observed that Mellin's inequality implies the existence of constants C 1 , C 2 > 0 such that the spectrum of B k is contained in…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will prove here Theorem 3.1 and Proposition 3.4, that is, that the projector Π : L 2 (Z) → H is an Hermite FIO of the same form as the Szego projector. Our starting point is the following result from [11]:…”
Section: Toeplitz Operators and Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%