2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10706-017-0166-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Large-Scale Shaking Table Model Test of the Shallow-Bias Tunnel with a Small Clear Distance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e stability of rock slope is also related to different types of rock [12,13]. e slope stability comparison between those only applied static load and those count for the extra impacts from earthquake [14][15][16]. e microstructure of the rock-soil in the dump has significant influence on the stability of dump [13,[17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e stability of rock slope is also related to different types of rock [12,13]. e slope stability comparison between those only applied static load and those count for the extra impacts from earthquake [14][15][16]. e microstructure of the rock-soil in the dump has significant influence on the stability of dump [13,[17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A layer of PVC lm was pasted on the polystyrene foam board at the left and right sides of the model box. e boundary of the model was dealt within literature [37,38].…”
Section: Time History Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both cases there was no significant change in the peak dynamic strain of the inverted arch on two sides of the flexible joints. Wang et al [19] also adopted the above-mentioned definition of the horizontal and vertical strategies and investigated experimentally two shallow-bias tunnels with a small clear distance subjected to the horizontal-vertical earthquake excitations with different levels. Results show that the acceleration amplification factors of the vertical-direction were generally larger (1.02-3.94 times) that that of the horizontal-direction and the earthquake intensity presented different influence on the acceleration responses in the horizontal and vertical directions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%