2013
DOI: 10.1002/ggge.20057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The large‐scale surface uplift in the Altiplano‐Puna region of Bolivia: A parametric study of source characteristics and crustal rheology using finite element analysis

Abstract: [1] This paper focuses on the driving mechanism behind a 70 km wide region of ground uplift centered on Uturuncu volcano, in the Altiplano-Puna region of southern Bolivia. We present a series of forward models using finite element analysis to simultaneously test for first-order parameters that help constrain a viable model for the observed maximum line of sight uplift rate of 1-2 cm/yr between 1992 and 2006. Stresses from pressure sources with finite geometries are solved numerically, accounting for both homog… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
65
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
4
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Required mean amplitudes of excess pressurization to explain the available geodetic time series are very small (<0.006 MPa/yr). The pressure changes are significantly lower than those calculated in earlier models (Pritchard and Simons, 2002;Hickey et al, 2013). This difference is due to several factors: in increasing order of significance, (1) the invoked mechanical heterogeneity in physical properties of the crust, (2) the thermally controlled time-dependent stress relaxation, (3) the size and configuration of the reservoirs, and (4) the invoked bulge above the APMB.…”
Section: Best-fit Model and Relation To Existing Modelsmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Required mean amplitudes of excess pressurization to explain the available geodetic time series are very small (<0.006 MPa/yr). The pressure changes are significantly lower than those calculated in earlier models (Pritchard and Simons, 2002;Hickey et al, 2013). This difference is due to several factors: in increasing order of significance, (1) the invoked mechanical heterogeneity in physical properties of the crust, (2) the thermally controlled time-dependent stress relaxation, (3) the size and configuration of the reservoirs, and (4) the invoked bulge above the APMB.…”
Section: Best-fit Model and Relation To Existing Modelsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…1). Several explanations have been proposed for the deformation anomaly, including the pressurization of subsurface cavities (as a proxy for magma reservoirs) located at various crustal depths above, within, and below the APMB, and complex interactions between multiple magmatic systems located at upper to lower crustal levels (Pritchard and Simons, 2002;Sparks et al, 2008;Hickey et al, 2013). Alternatively, Fialko and Pearse (2012) proposed the ascent of a magmatic diapir from the APMB to explain a broad moat of relative ground subsidence surrounding a central area of ground uplift (Figs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Henderson and Pritchard | Time-dependent deformation of Uturuncu volcano GEOSPHERE | Volume 13 | Number 6 decades due to increasing reservoir pressurization (e.g., Pritchard and Simons, 2004;Hickey et al, 2013) or buoyant diapiric ascent (Fialko and Pearse, 2012;del Potro et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the evidence for mid-crustal melt, observed deformation at Uturuncu was previously hypothesized to be caused by magmatic intrusion into or out of the APMB (e.g., Pritchard and Simons, 2004;Hickey et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biggs et al 2009). However, subsurface structures and the thermal influence of the magma system itself may introduce complexities that may bias the model results (Hickey et al 2013). Such influences are best investigated using Finite Element Analysis but the high computational requirements and huge number of parameters means that full testing of the parameter space, error estimates and non-unique solutions are challenging.…”
Section: Exploring the Underlying Processes Leading To The Observed Smentioning
confidence: 99%