2020
DOI: 10.1017/s0956536119000233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Last Hurrah: Examining the Nature of Peri-Abandonment Deposits and Activities at Cahal Pech, Belize

Abstract: Archaeological investigations by the Belize Valley Archaeological Reconnaissance Project at Cahal Pech uncovered several Terminal Classic (a.d. 750–900) peri-abandonment deposits and activity areas at this Belize River Valley center. The deposits contained a diverse assemblage of cultural remains located above and between collapsed architecture, associated with evidence for burning activities. In the past, archaeologists have generally interpreted similar assemblages as “problematic deposits”—“de facto” refuse… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
5
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, based on the multiple lines of evidence we describe above, we suggest that these cultural remains were deposited at sites across the region by remnant populations still living at these centers (Lamoureux-St-Hilaire et al 2015), or by local communities who conducted pilgrimages and/or propitiation rituals at the sacred places of their ancestors. That those involved are likely local is suggested by the strontium isotope analysis of the human remains we have recovered in both intrusive burials and deposits at the sites, and by the fact that the deposits mostly contain locally produced objects (Aimers and Awe 2020;Stemp and Awe 2020). This perspective also fits the general consensus that abandonment of Maya sites was not an overnight phenomenon, but rather a gradual, perhaps even protracted, process that took place over several years (Webster 2002).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Instead, based on the multiple lines of evidence we describe above, we suggest that these cultural remains were deposited at sites across the region by remnant populations still living at these centers (Lamoureux-St-Hilaire et al 2015), or by local communities who conducted pilgrimages and/or propitiation rituals at the sacred places of their ancestors. That those involved are likely local is suggested by the strontium isotope analysis of the human remains we have recovered in both intrusive burials and deposits at the sites, and by the fact that the deposits mostly contain locally produced objects (Aimers and Awe 2020;Stemp and Awe 2020). This perspective also fits the general consensus that abandonment of Maya sites was not an overnight phenomenon, but rather a gradual, perhaps even protracted, process that took place over several years (Webster 2002).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Their deposition within the cenote, however, forces us to consider alternative functions for their final use. In the case of the cenote assemblage, that function is most likely ritual in nature, a situation similar to that noted by Helmke (2015, 2019) for a European sword deposited by the Maya in Rapier Cave in Western Belize, and by Stemp and Awe (2020) for the chert projectile points from the periabandonment deposits at Cahal Pech.…”
Section: Comparisons To Cultural Remains Recovered From the "Cenote Osupporting
confidence: 65%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We believe we must endeavor to adopt a shared interpretative framework and terminology to achieve a better understanding of Classic Maya settlement abandonment. Abandoning the concept of "problematic deposit" (Aimers et al 2020) may be a productive first step towards this goal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%