The Last Word: Books as a Statistical Metaphor for Microbial Communities

Abstract

Microbial communities contain unparalleled complexity, making them difficult to describe and compare. Characterizing this complexity will contribute to understanding the ecological processes that drive microbe-host interactions, bioremediation, and biogeochemistry. Moreover, an estimate of species richness will provide an indication of the completeness of a community profile. Such estimates are difficult, however, because community structure rarely fits a well-defined distribution. We present a model based on the word usage in books to illustrate the power of statistical tools in describing microbial communities and suggesting biological hypotheses. The model also generates data to test these methods when there are insufficient data in the literature. For example, by simulating the word distribution in books, we can predict the number of words that must be read to estimate the size of the vocabulary used to write the book. Combined with other models that have been used to make inaccessible problems tractable, our book model offers a unique approach to the complex problem of describing microbial diversity.

Sinus microbiota varies among chronic rhinosinusitis phenotypes and predicts surgical outcome

“…Standard ecological a diversity indices (eg, Chao1 and Shannon diversity 46,47 ), as inferred by rarefaction and bootstrap analysis with 1000 replicate re-samplings, were assessed by using ANOVA. Associations between microbiome composition and patient clinical/demographic factors were assessed by using a nonparametric, permutation-based multivariable ANOVA, as implemented through the adonis function of the R package vegan.…”

Mass spectrometry tools and workflows for revealing microbial chemistry

“…The traditional methods for studying such interactions relied on indirect measurements with tedious bioactivity-directed fractionation assays to reach that single target molecule. On top of that, microbial communities rarely exist as a monoculture and contain high degree of complexity, employing many different classes of molecules necessary for their interactions 58, 61 . Today’s MS tools are beginning to enable the analysis of multiple molecules (chemotype) and correlate the observed chemistries to the relevant phenomenon or biological question (phenotype) from a complex sample 56, 57, 62, 63 .…”

On the origin of prokaryotic species

“…Environmental and metagenomic methods employed include Sanger sequencing of cloned libraries of PCRamplified rRNA genes or of the internal transcribed spacers (ITS) between them and of small random clones and fosmid ends, or massive pyrosequencing of uncloned DNA. With such methods, biases in cultivation are eliminated, but others remain: PCR amplification bias, the formation of artifactual chimeras, the presence of multiple slightly different rRNA genes in some species, errors in sequencing (creating an excess of very similar sequences), and, in very many studies, inadequate sampling (Schloss and Handelsman 2007).…”