2016
DOI: 10.26879/657
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The late Miocene caimanine fauna (Crocodylia: Alligatoroidea) of the Urumaco Formation, Venezuela

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
35
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2C) from the late Miocene Solimões Formation of Brazil that may be more closely related to M. amazonensis for sharing with this species the same morphology of the jugals. This taxonomic perspective of UFAC-1424 is distinct from those of the holotype and other described specimens of M. nativus , which consist solely of isolated skull tables (see Gasparini, 1985, Cidade et al, 2013 and Scheyer et al, 2013) and can be assigned to M. arendsi following Scheyer & Delfino (2016). Further studies are required to settle the taxonomic assignment of UFAC-1424; in this paper, this specimen is considered as a potential distinct form of Mourasuchus and was used for morphological comparisons and included in the phylogenetic analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2C) from the late Miocene Solimões Formation of Brazil that may be more closely related to M. amazonensis for sharing with this species the same morphology of the jugals. This taxonomic perspective of UFAC-1424 is distinct from those of the holotype and other described specimens of M. nativus , which consist solely of isolated skull tables (see Gasparini, 1985, Cidade et al, 2013 and Scheyer et al, 2013) and can be assigned to M. arendsi following Scheyer & Delfino (2016). Further studies are required to settle the taxonomic assignment of UFAC-1424; in this paper, this specimen is considered as a potential distinct form of Mourasuchus and was used for morphological comparisons and included in the phylogenetic analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…In particular for Mourasuchus , this geologic unit already had occurrences of the species M. arendsi (Bocquentin-Villanueva, 1984; Scheyer & Delfino, 2016). The description of the new taxon Mourasuchus pattersoni sp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Together with Globidentosuchus brachyrostris , Caiman australis Bravard, ; Bona and Barrios, , Caiman brevirostris Souza‐Filho, , Caiman gasparinae Bona and Carabajal, , Caiman lutescens Rovereto, , Caiman wannlangstoni Salas‐Gismondi et al, , Gnatusuchus pebasensis Salas‐Gismondi et al, , Kuttanacaiman iquitosensis Salas‐Gismondi et al, , Mourasuchus arendsi Bocquentin‐Villanueva, , Purussaurus mirandai Aguilera, Riff, and Bocquentin‐Villanueva, , Paleosuchus sp. Gray, , Purussaurus brasiliensis Barbosa‐Rodrigues, (see Salas‐Gismondi et al, ; Scheyer & Delfino, ; Scheyer et al, ), Melanosuchus is a component of the high caimanine diversity that evolved in Amazonia since the Late Miocene.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(see Bona et al, in press). The morphometric analyses reveal that MCNC 243 is nested at the margin of the Melanosuchus niger morphospace, and has a relatively robust morphology for its size (see also AMU-CURS-234) (Scheyer & Delfino, 2016), which is the only character of the original diagnosis from Medina (1976) that is actually present in this specimen. However, treating the robust- Melanosuchus and C. latirostris (see above), where Melanosuchus is nested within the genus Caiman (Brochu, 1999(Brochu, , 2004(Brochu, , 2011Hastings et al, 2016;Poe, 1996).…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation