2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.07.23.217547
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Latency of Spontaneous Eye Blinks Marks Relevant Visual and Auditory Information Processing

Abstract: Eye blinks are influenced by several external sensory and internal cognitive factors. However, neither the precise temporal effects of these factors on blinking nor how their timing compares between modalities is known. Our aim was to understand the influence of sensory input vs task-relevant information on blinks in the visual and auditory domain.Using a visual and an auditory temporal judgement task, we found that blinks were suppressed during stimulus presentation in both domains and the overall input lengt… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 44 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• Physiological measures among the iEEG channels (electrocardiogram, breathing and electrooculography), if available, are a valuable source of information. Previously we used electrooculography to infer saccade data, although patterns of eye blinks have been related to processing of relevant detail in perceptual input 64 . Electrocardiogram and breathing have been shown to correlate with cognitive states during experimental stimulation [65][66][67] .…”
Section: Additional Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Physiological measures among the iEEG channels (electrocardiogram, breathing and electrooculography), if available, are a valuable source of information. Previously we used electrooculography to infer saccade data, although patterns of eye blinks have been related to processing of relevant detail in perceptual input 64 . Electrocardiogram and breathing have been shown to correlate with cognitive states during experimental stimulation [65][66][67] .…”
Section: Additional Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%