2005
DOI: 10.3386/w11631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Law and Economics of Antidiscrimination Law

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 114 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They also touch on socially undesirable, illegal and commercially sensitive factors that invite misrepresentation in both survey and interview contexts. Former Ansett employees' questionnaire self-reports do not constitute practically adequate evidence of discrimination, but supplementing their comments with the views of airline recruitment personnel would not necessarily improve matters, since discriminators rarely perceive their own conduct as discriminatory (Donohue, 2005).…”
Section: Methodological Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also touch on socially undesirable, illegal and commercially sensitive factors that invite misrepresentation in both survey and interview contexts. Former Ansett employees' questionnaire self-reports do not constitute practically adequate evidence of discrimination, but supplementing their comments with the views of airline recruitment personnel would not necessarily improve matters, since discriminators rarely perceive their own conduct as discriminatory (Donohue, 2005).…”
Section: Methodological Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Belief in the power of markets to eliminate discrimination can be challenged by the argument that imperfect competition is common in labour markets, although as we have seen in earlier chapters this claim is contested. However, more sophisticated analysis (see Donohue 2005) suggests that theoretical models may produce different outcomes depending on the distribution of discriminatory tastes and the size of the group discriminated against. For instance, if most employers are strong discriminators and the discriminated-against group is large, the outcome will be different from a situation where few employers discriminate and there are few in the discriminated-against group.…”
Section: Gary Beckermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A survey by Fang and Moro (2010) reviews theoretical models of statistical discrimination and affirmative actions. The interdisciplinary economic-legal paper by Donohue (2007) provides an overview of the connections between economic models and empirical findings on the one hand, and the U.S. anti-discrimination laws on the other. Charles and Guryan (2011) discuss several challenges that "frustrate empirical research" on racial labor market discrimination, including the difficulty of comparing individuals of different races who may systematically differ in terms of some unobserved or unobservable determinants, and the problems with the indirect testing of economic models (i.e., with testing their predictions), rather than directly testing the mechanism assumed by the model (i.e., prejudice for taste-based discrimination, and information limitation for statistical discrimination).…”
Section: Annotated Bibliographymentioning
confidence: 99%