1968
DOI: 10.1176/ajp.125.2.213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Law of Private Imprisonment: Fifty Dark Years for the Mentally Ill in Japan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1968
1968
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The “Mental Patients’ Custody Act, 1900” ( Seishin Byosha Kango Ho , 1900) was the first law governing mental health care policy in Japan. It required families to segregate patients in prison-like “private residences” ( Zashiki Ro ) (Kumasaka and Yoshioka, 1968). The government then established the “Mental Hospital Act, 1919” ( Seisin Byoin Ho , 1919) to encourage municipal authorities to set up public hospitals for psychiatric patients.…”
Section: Background To Japanese Mental Health Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The “Mental Patients’ Custody Act, 1900” ( Seishin Byosha Kango Ho , 1900) was the first law governing mental health care policy in Japan. It required families to segregate patients in prison-like “private residences” ( Zashiki Ro ) (Kumasaka and Yoshioka, 1968). The government then established the “Mental Hospital Act, 1919” ( Seisin Byoin Ho , 1919) to encourage municipal authorities to set up public hospitals for psychiatric patients.…”
Section: Background To Japanese Mental Health Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another characteristic feature of the canonical texts of history of Japanese psychiatry is the line of demarcation between two diametrically opposed narratives. The first, represented by the works of Totsuka Etsurō, Kumasaka Yoshino and Yoshioka Shinji, engages in a fierce critique of the backwardness of Japanese psychiatry and its inhuman practices (see Totsuka 1990;Kumasaka and Yoshioka 1968), mirroring the common Western criticism of 20thcentury medicine (see Stieda 1906: 514-522). The second, 'nihonron-like' narrative challenges these accusations by referring to genuine Japanese modes of psychiatric care in order to draw a more positive picture of early Japanese psychiatry (see Suzuki 2003a: 193-225;Nakatani 2003: 194-198).…”
Section: Breaking Into Historymentioning
confidence: 99%