1984
DOI: 10.1016/0166-6622(84)80155-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The layer thickness of adsorbed nonionic surfactants: comparison between electrokinetic and film thickness methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is known that at low PVP concentrations the typical conformation of PVP chain molecules at the solid/aqueous solution interface consists of a sequence of many short loops and trains and at higher coverage the bound fraction decreases due to the formation of a relatively dense loop layer, with a few long tails protruding into the solution as mentioned above. Adsorbed layer thickness in the range 5−10 nm (plateau adsorption region) are known in the case of Pluronic F68, poly(ethylene oxide), nonylphenyl poly(propylene oxide)−poly(ethylene oxide) adducts and poly(vinylpyrrolidone), which is consistent with our results. Further, hydrodynamic thickness of adsorbed polymer layers has been calculated by Stuart et al .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…It is known that at low PVP concentrations the typical conformation of PVP chain molecules at the solid/aqueous solution interface consists of a sequence of many short loops and trains and at higher coverage the bound fraction decreases due to the formation of a relatively dense loop layer, with a few long tails protruding into the solution as mentioned above. Adsorbed layer thickness in the range 5−10 nm (plateau adsorption region) are known in the case of Pluronic F68, poly(ethylene oxide), nonylphenyl poly(propylene oxide)−poly(ethylene oxide) adducts and poly(vinylpyrrolidone), which is consistent with our results. Further, hydrodynamic thickness of adsorbed polymer layers has been calculated by Stuart et al .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In a densely packed SAM, however, steric constraints prevent hydronium ions or cations from penetrating the SAM.] We therefore suggest an alternative explanation for the decrease of the electrokinetic potentials with increasing coverage, following the electrokinetic studies of Stuart et al on PEO-block-copolymers (streaming potential) 35,36 and of Cohen et al (electrophoretic mobility) 37 on liposomes grafted with PEG chains of similar (n ) 45) and higher chain length. Using Smoluchowski theory for the electrophoretic mobility, they observed for liposomes of identical surface charge a decreasing electrokinetic potential with increasing length of the grafted PEG chain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Although there is convincing evidence for preferential cation binding within poly(ethylene oxide) gels, 32 the results obtained in the electrokinetic characterization of SAM-based OEG and PEG layers confirm charging through preferential adsorption of hydroxide anions for EG 3 OMe/Au surfaces, 19 while on the PEG SAMs the negative surface charge could also be caused by ion adsorption on uncovered segments of the underlying substrate. Differences in the electrokinetic charge in the PEG/Au systems as a function of coverage can be attributed to hydrodynamic effects without implying significant charging on the PEG chain itself, 18,[32][33][34][35] or alternatively to a decease in adsorbed hydroxide ion concentration due to reduced image charge stabilization with increasing film thickness. 33 We first discuss the negative charges caused by hydroxide adsorption on the OEG SAM surfaces, and then suggest models to explain the observations on the PEG surfaces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24,26 Examples of good agreement between δ h (measured by PCS) and δ s (obtained by the surface forces apparatus) have been published, for both adsorbed homopolymers 27,28 and block copolymers. 22,29 Several issues regarding the relationship between the hydrodynamic adlayer thickness, adlayer structure, and the stability of colloids supporting such adlayers remain to be investigated. For example, while hydrodynamic thicknesses measured by PCS often accord with steric thicknesses determined by SFA measurements, studies showing such comparisons have not been accompanied with direct determinations of colloid stability, as might be quantified by determination of the stability ratio, W. Also, while it has been surmised that only a very low density of tails might be sufficient to confer steric stability, [30][31][32] experiments providing the minimum density for steric stability for any specific system have not been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%