2012
DOI: 10.5091/plecevo.2012.665
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The leaf size/number trade-off within species and within plants for woody angiosperms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
16
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The leaf size/number trade‐off has also been reported between herbaceous species (Whitman & Aarssen ), between plants (within‐species) for both trees (Dombroskie & Aarssen ; Jarcuska & Milla ) and herbs (Scott & Aarssen ), between genders for dioecious angiosperms (Scott & Aarssen ), and even at the between‐shoot (within‐tree) level (Dombroskie & Aarssen ; Jarcuska & Milla ). Evidence from these studies suggests that leafing intensity is generally: higher in herbaceous species (and plants within species) that have smaller body size (Whitman & Aarssen ; Scott & Aarssen ); higher in more shaded woody shoots within a canopy (Dombroskie & Aarssen ); and higher within male plants in dioecious species (Scott & Aarssen ). In some cases, the leaf size/leafing intensity trade‐off can be allometric, and this may be interpreted in terms of adaptive leaf deployment strategies (Dombroskie & Aarssen ; Jarcuska & Milla ; Scott & Aarssen ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The leaf size/number trade‐off has also been reported between herbaceous species (Whitman & Aarssen ), between plants (within‐species) for both trees (Dombroskie & Aarssen ; Jarcuska & Milla ) and herbs (Scott & Aarssen ), between genders for dioecious angiosperms (Scott & Aarssen ), and even at the between‐shoot (within‐tree) level (Dombroskie & Aarssen ; Jarcuska & Milla ). Evidence from these studies suggests that leafing intensity is generally: higher in herbaceous species (and plants within species) that have smaller body size (Whitman & Aarssen ; Scott & Aarssen ); higher in more shaded woody shoots within a canopy (Dombroskie & Aarssen ); and higher within male plants in dioecious species (Scott & Aarssen ). In some cases, the leaf size/leafing intensity trade‐off can be allometric, and this may be interpreted in terms of adaptive leaf deployment strategies (Dombroskie & Aarssen ; Jarcuska & Milla ; Scott & Aarssen ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…species at high vs. low altitude) (Yang, Li & Sun 2008;Li et al 2009;Milla 2009;Xiang, Wu & Sun 2010;Milla & Reich 2011;Yan et al 2012). The leaf size/number trade-off has also been reported between herbaceous species (Whitman & Aarssen 2010), between plants (within-species) for both trees (Dombroskie & Aarssen 2012;Jarcuska & Milla 2012) and herbs (Scott & Aarssen 2012), between genders for dioecious angiosperms (Scott & Aarssen 2013), and even at the between-shoot (within-tree) level (Dombroskie & Aarssen 2012;Jarcuska & Milla 2012). Evidence from these studies suggests that leafing intensity is generally: higher in herbaceous species (and plants within species) that have smaller body size (Whitman & Aarssen 2010;Scott & Aarssen 2012); higher in more shaded woody shoots within a canopy (Dombroskie & Aarssen 2012); and higher within male plants in dioecious species (Scott & Aarssen 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…; Reich ). Plants with smaller leaves might also be associated with higher leafing intensity (Milla ; Milla & Reich ; Dombroskie & Aarssen ), which relates to higher secondary growth and a larger bud bank for recovery after damage to tissues, e.g. frost damage (Yan et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the competitive advantages of larger leaves are lower in frost hollows where there is higher exposure to severe temperatures (Nicotra et al 2011;Reich 2014). Plants with smaller leaves might also be associated with higher leafing intensity (Milla 2009;Milla & Reich 2011;Dombroskie & Aarssen 2012), which relates to higher secondary growth and a larger bud bank for recovery after damage to tissues, e.g. frost damage (Yan et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%