2022
DOI: 10.1112/jlms.12518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The least degree of a CM point on a modular curve

Abstract: For a modular curve X=X0(N)$X = X_0(N)$, X1(N)$X_1(N)$ or X1(M,N)$X_1(M,N)$ defined over Q$\mathbb {Q}$, we denote by dCM(X)$d_{\operatorname{CM}}(X)$ the least degree of a CM point on X$X$. For each discriminant normalΔ<0$\Delta < 0$, we determine the least degree of a point on X0(N)$X_0(N)$ with CM by the order of discriminant Δ$\Delta$. This places us in a position to study dCM(X)$d_{\operatorname{CM}}(X)$ as an ‘arithmetic function’ and we do so, obtaining various upper bounds, lower bounds and typical … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(161 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Next, the non-cuspidal rational points on X + 0 (116) correspond to CM points by [32, Theorem 0.1], and so P must be a CM point. From the data associated to the paper [13] (available at https://github.com/fsaia/least-cm-degree/blob/master/Least%20Degrees/X0), we obtain five possible pairs (j, L) of j-invariants j and quadratic fields L for the pair (j(P ), K). Each of these pairs in fact already arises as the j-invariant and field of definition of one of the points P 1 , .…”
Section: Going Downmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, the non-cuspidal rational points on X + 0 (116) correspond to CM points by [32, Theorem 0.1], and so P must be a CM point. From the data associated to the paper [13] (available at https://github.com/fsaia/least-cm-degree/blob/master/Least%20Degrees/X0), we obtain five possible pairs (j, L) of j-invariants j and quadratic fields L for the pair (j(P ), K). Each of these pairs in fact already arises as the j-invariant and field of definition of one of the points P 1 , .…”
Section: Going Downmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, after computing the pullbacks of the rational points on X + 0 (N), we have all the quadratic points on X 0 (N). Using data provided to us by the authors of [9] and which can be obtained using [9, Theorem 3.7], we can conclude over which quadratic fields there exist CM points and how many there are. This allows us to conclude that the only non-CM points are the points on X 0 (125) defined over Q( √ 509).…”
Section: The Non-hyperelliptic Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( (4,4), (5,10), (6,6), (7,7), (7,49), (10,10), (49, 49)}. These leaves only (M, N ) = (3, 3), but Z/3Z × Z/3Z occurs already in degree 2 by [6].…”
Section: Determining New Torsion Subgroupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the collection of all CM elliptic curves, the classification of torsion subgroups is known for any d ≤ 13 or for any odd d > 13; see [6,22,5,4]. We note that CM elliptic curves produce many examples of sporadic points on modular curves (see, for example, [7]), so this provides further motivation for studying this class in particular.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%