2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2004.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The left periphery in agrammatic clausal representations: evidence from German

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
22
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, several recent studies have found production of elements associated with CP to be more impaired than production of elements associated with lower functional projections. This selective impairment of CP has been observed in Japanese (Hagiwara, 1995); Hebrew, Palestinian Arabic, and English (Friedmann, 2001;Friedmann, 2002); German (Burchert, Swoboda-Moll, De Bleser, 2005b) and Greek (Stavrakaki & Kouvava, 2003). Consistent with the tree structure proposed by Pollock (1989), in which IP is `split' further into separate tense and agreement nodes, the Tree Pruning Hypothesis (TPH) has also proposed that verb morphology associated with tense should be more impaired than morphology associated with agreement.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Moreover, several recent studies have found production of elements associated with CP to be more impaired than production of elements associated with lower functional projections. This selective impairment of CP has been observed in Japanese (Hagiwara, 1995); Hebrew, Palestinian Arabic, and English (Friedmann, 2001;Friedmann, 2002); German (Burchert, Swoboda-Moll, De Bleser, 2005b) and Greek (Stavrakaki & Kouvava, 2003). Consistent with the tree structure proposed by Pollock (1989), in which IP is `split' further into separate tense and agreement nodes, the Tree Pruning Hypothesis (TPH) has also proposed that verb morphology associated with tense should be more impaired than morphology associated with agreement.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Second, the syntactic difference between wh-questions and yes/no-questions, as, despite the fact that in both question types there is an operator under the Spec, CP, they differ as to the movement of the operator: in wh-questions an operator moves from its base-generated position to the Spec, CP, whereas in yes/noquestions no movement occurs, since an empty operator is directly generated under the Spec, CP. On the basis of these facts, Burchert et al (2005) formulated two hypotheses: the Operator Movement Hypothesis and the Empty Category Deletion Hypothesis. According to the former, some agrammatic speakers have difficulty moving the operator, which affects wh-questions.…”
Section: Wh-questions and Syntactic Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Os dados de fala espontânea do Holandês e do Alemão (Kolk e Heeschen 1992, de Roo 2001, Bastiaanse e van Zonneveld 1998, Burchert et al 2005 indicam que quando um verbo flexionado é produzido, ele aparece na segunda posição da sentença, ou seja, movido de sua posição de origem, que é a final. Dados de teste com falantes do Alemão (Wenzlaff e Clahsen 2005) e do Holandês (Kok et al 2006) apontam para o mesmo padrão.…”
Section: Movimento De V Para C Em Declarativasunclassified