2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.04.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The left splenorenal venous shunt decreases clinical signs of sinistral portal hypertension associated with splenic vein ligation during pancreaticoduodenectomy with venous resection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been shown that the patients undergoing additional gastric resection faced with significantly deteriorated postoperative nutritional status and quality of life [31]. Therefore, surgical reconstructive venous drainage of the gastric and splenic vein may provide an alternative to avoid venous congestion and additional gastrectomy [18,32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been shown that the patients undergoing additional gastric resection faced with significantly deteriorated postoperative nutritional status and quality of life [31]. Therefore, surgical reconstructive venous drainage of the gastric and splenic vein may provide an alternative to avoid venous congestion and additional gastrectomy [18,32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distal splenorenal shunt (SRS) is one option of a portosystemic shunt that allows gastric and splenic venous drainage via the left renal vein into the systemic circulation [15][16][17]. Recently, it has been shown that performing SRS during pancreatoduodenectomy may reduce postoperative severe complications, such as left-sided portal hypertension [17,18]. In the same time period, the procedure has been developed and implemented in our center for patients with signs of venous congestion after portal venous resection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As expected, cases included in the first group reported a significantly longer overall median survival time (18 months) when compared to cases included in the fourth group (in which the overall median survival time was only 10 months) (14). When it comes to the necessity of splenic vein reimplantation, different points of view have been proposed so far; therefore, while certain authors consider that after extended venous resections the splenic vein can be safely ligated, an adequate collateral circulation being expected, others consider that the risk of splenic infraction or gastric varices development is too high and therefore, they recommend to avoid this maneuver and to re-anastomose it at the level of the graft (20)(21)(22)(23)(24).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies indicated no gastrointestinal bleeding even after the incidence of varicose formation [ 10 , 14 , 18 , 21 , 26 , 27 , 28 ], but others reported the incidence of severe variceal bleeding [ 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 11 , 13 , 17 , 19 , 24 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 ]. This difference may be due to the dedicated adjustment of SV pressure by collateral routes from the spleen.…”
Section: Pathogenesis Of Sphmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reflecting the increased spleen volume after surgery, the platelet count ratio at 6 months after surgery in the patients after the SV resection was significantly lower than that in patients without the SV resection [ 13 , 16 , 37 ]. This SV pressure could be controlled by increasing collaterals from the spleen, through methods such as SV reconstruction [ 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 31 , 38 ] or decreasing the blood inflow to the spleen (splenic artery ligation) [ 16 , 37 ].…”
Section: Pathogenesis Of Sphmentioning
confidence: 99%