The Legal Implications of Public Support Policies Targeting Research, Development and Innovation in the European Union

Abstract

The research problem of this article focuses on how the public support system in Estonia can help small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to acquire and commercialise their intellectual property rights (IPR) in a sustainable and legally permissible manner. The study aims to analyse and determine which specific public support measures are needed by SMEs for acquiring and commercialising IPR and how to design such public support within the legal boundaries set under European Union (EU) laws. The theoretical framework used in this study is built around the social system as defined by Parsons. The 4S Model (based on scope, scale, skill and social networking) derived by researchers from the said social system is considered. Further, 19 key attributes were devised by the authors in conjunction with the role of motivation to form a revised framework. The analysis employs qualitative research methods. To apply the framework of social systems theory, the authors used semi-structured interviews as a method to study the public support measures required by Estonian stakeholders. This was also analysed in the framework of EU State aid law, which poses both restrictions and exemptions. This research presents several desired support measures. Although the public support systems for acquiring and commercialising IPR by SMEs are restrained by legal frameworks within the EU, the analysis of the relevant laws and cases shows that State aid for RDI purposes is legally permissible within the EU, depending on the state’s willingness and availability of funds.

Impact Evaluation of the Graduate Practice Intervention in Slovakia with the Application of the CART Method

“…The ex-post evaluations are very useful, providing information about the participants' course of employment or other outcomes during the defined impact period after the end of the program. In recent years, counterfactual impact evaluation methods have recorded a growing interest to realise expost evaluations of ALMP instruments (Dutt & Nyman-Metcalf, 2021).…”

Current status and influencing factors of policy identification in health impact assessment: a case study of Zhejiang Province

“…Taking the function as Y —policy identification; F( X 1)—trust in political authority; F( X 2)—procedural justice; and F( X 3)—subjective evaluation of distributive justice, the above formula can be expressed as: Y = F( X 1· X 2· X 3). Notably, policy identification has been widely applied in sociology [ 12 ], leadership actions [ 13 ], innovation management [ 14 ], empirical and historical research [ 15 ], economics [ 16 ], education and educational research [ 17 ], among others. However, its role in the field of health, and healthcare systems [ 18 ], particularly in HIA research, has been overlooked.…”