The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements 2007
DOI: 10.1002/9780470999103.ch20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Legislative, Organizational, and Beneficiary Consequences of State-Oriented Challengers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
76
0
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
0
76
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Most studies examining the outcome of social movements have focused on legislative and policy changes (e.g., Amenta and Caren, 2004;Soule and King, 2006;Johnson, 2008), while the organizational mechanisms and changes entailed in implementing legislation and policy have been largely ignored. The few studies that have focused on movements' effects on organizations have been concerned primarily with intended changes such as the growth of the grass-fed beef market, the creation of insurance cooperatives, and the formation and survival of alternative energy producers (e.g., Weber, Heinze, and DeSoucey, 2008;Schneiberg, King, and Smith, 2008;Sine and Lee, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies examining the outcome of social movements have focused on legislative and policy changes (e.g., Amenta and Caren, 2004;Soule and King, 2006;Johnson, 2008), while the organizational mechanisms and changes entailed in implementing legislation and policy have been largely ignored. The few studies that have focused on movements' effects on organizations have been concerned primarily with intended changes such as the growth of the grass-fed beef market, the creation of insurance cooperatives, and the formation and survival of alternative energy producers (e.g., Weber, Heinze, and DeSoucey, 2008;Schneiberg, King, and Smith, 2008;Sine and Lee, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The outcome of acceptance is often viewed as a critical precursor to substantive legislative victories [22]. However, Amenta et al [45] note that, because democratic governments usually recognize movements and interest groups as legitimate challengers, scholars have largely moved beyond viewing acceptance as a movement outcome, preferring instead to focus on "a modified version of Gamson's "inclusion", or challengers who gain state positions through election or appointment, which can lead to collective benefits" ( [43], p. 291). As we noted above, the conservative Evangelical movement has been widely acknowledged as being exceptionally successful at both entering and developing an enduring bond with the GOP (Grand Old Party, or Republican Party) [46].…”
Section: Policy Diffusion As a Movement Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, cultural change or changes in the social norms and behaviors in which political actors operate, have been studies the least (see review in Earl 2004). The third, political change, or those effects of movement activities that alter in some way the movements' political environment, have been studied most often (see reviews in Amenta and Caren 2004;Burstein and Linton 2002;Giugni , 2008Uba 2009). Research on the biographical, cultural, and political outcomes of social movements has provided a number of important insights into the conditions and processes through which movements succeed or fail.…”
Section: The Consequences Of Social Movementsmentioning
confidence: 99%