2016
DOI: 10.4038/jdp.v11i1.7689
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The legitimacy of the atypical (C3) breast cytology category

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the C3 cases, two cases (3.3%) unveiled benign lesions on histopathology. Zardawi et al's[14] study similarly found benign proliferative lesions and low-grade cancers within the C3 category, mirroring our findings. In the C4 category, five cases (8.3%) indicated malignancy on histopathology.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…Among the C3 cases, two cases (3.3%) unveiled benign lesions on histopathology. Zardawi et al's[14] study similarly found benign proliferative lesions and low-grade cancers within the C3 category, mirroring our findings. In the C4 category, five cases (8.3%) indicated malignancy on histopathology.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…ILC also featured in the C3 group, mainly because of paucicellularity of the sample and the coexistence of benign epithelium. [12] In C4 category, 18 cases were available Histologically. Of the 18 cases 15 cases were diagnosed as invasive ductal carcinoma, 1 case as invasive lobular carcinoma, 1 case as carcinoma with neuroendocrine feature and 1 case as cystic papillary neoplasm.…”
Section: A-56mentioning
confidence: 99%