2013
DOI: 10.22146/kawistara.3979
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Legitimazation of Violence Against the Ahmadiyya Community in Indonesia

Abstract: The Ahmadiyah community in Indonesia has experienced increasing infringement on their religiousfreedom in various forms during the last ten years. The opening up of democracy in 1998 resultedin the involvement of “non state actors “in religious violence. Despite increasing attacks against theAhmadiyah community, the state has been reluctant to prevent or punish religious attacks against theAhmadiyah community. In this article I argue that violence against the Ahmadiyah is in danger ofbecoming legitimate.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This group found a wider stage when the Indonesian Council of Ulama (MUI) fatwa and Local Government rules were used to legitimate the act of violence against the Ahmadiyya congregation. Central and regional government regulations, one of which is for Ahmadiyya to stop activities that are not following the interpretation of Islamic teachings (Hartawan, Cahyowati, and Zunnuraeni 2019) as as the MUI's fatwa declaring Ahmadiyya to be deviant (Alnizar 2019a;Alnizar, Ma'ruf, and Manshur 2021;Breidlid 2013;Assyaukanie 2009) realized or not, become a tangible manifestation of the symbolic violence against the Ahmadiyya congregation. It has been the capital (referring to Bourdieu's term) to justify the violence.…”
Section: Discussion Symbolic Violence In Urban Communitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This group found a wider stage when the Indonesian Council of Ulama (MUI) fatwa and Local Government rules were used to legitimate the act of violence against the Ahmadiyya congregation. Central and regional government regulations, one of which is for Ahmadiyya to stop activities that are not following the interpretation of Islamic teachings (Hartawan, Cahyowati, and Zunnuraeni 2019) as as the MUI's fatwa declaring Ahmadiyya to be deviant (Alnizar 2019a;Alnizar, Ma'ruf, and Manshur 2021;Breidlid 2013;Assyaukanie 2009) realized or not, become a tangible manifestation of the symbolic violence against the Ahmadiyya congregation. It has been the capital (referring to Bourdieu's term) to justify the violence.…”
Section: Discussion Symbolic Violence In Urban Communitymentioning
confidence: 99%