1998
DOI: 10.1097/00000539-199808000-00004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Level of Anesthesia Resident Training Does Not Affect the Risk of Dental Injury

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the level of training did not seem to affect the incidence of dental trauma or the force generated during intubation in previous analyses , we found that consultants actually generated higher dental strain with Macintosh‐type laryngoscopes (i.e. direct laryngoscope, C‐MAC) than trainees.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…Although the level of training did not seem to affect the incidence of dental trauma or the force generated during intubation in previous analyses , we found that consultants actually generated higher dental strain with Macintosh‐type laryngoscopes (i.e. direct laryngoscope, C‐MAC) than trainees.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…Lockhart et al, [8] surveyed 133 anesthesiology training programs and found an average incidence of 0.1% for dental injury during endotracheal intubations. This was corroborated with a study by Gaiser and colleagues, who found a similar 0.1% incidence of injury involving anesthesia residents in training [9]. However, other university training institutions have quoted an incidence rate closer to 0.02% -0.04% [2]- [4].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…4 However, one study notes that all injuries sustained were on the right side of the patient and implied that not only the laryngoscope but also the endotracheal tube insertion were to blame for dental injuries. 6 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%