2012
DOI: 10.1038/emboj.2012.166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Lgr5 intestinal stem cell signature: robust expression of proposed quiescent ‘+4’ cell markers

Abstract: Two types of stem cells are currently defined in small intestinal crypts: cycling crypt base columnar (CBC) cells and quiescent ‘+4’ cells. Here, we combine transcriptomics with proteomics to define a definitive molecular signature for Lgr5+ CBC cells. Transcriptional profiling of FACS‐sorted Lgr5+ stem cells and their daughters using two microarray platforms revealed an mRNA stem cell signature of 384 unique genes. Quantitative mass spectrometry on the same cell populations identified 278 proteins enriched in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

64
704
1
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 675 publications
(778 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
64
704
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In control mice, ISCs and secretory Paneth cells were both restricted to the crypt base, as assessed by RNA in situ hybridization for Olfm4 23 and Lysozyme IHC, respectively (Figure 3a and Supplementary Figure 4). Olfm4-positive ISCs had characteristic wedge-like shapes and were mostly proliferative, as shown by Ki67 staining.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In control mice, ISCs and secretory Paneth cells were both restricted to the crypt base, as assessed by RNA in situ hybridization for Olfm4 23 and Lysozyme IHC, respectively (Figure 3a and Supplementary Figure 4). Olfm4-positive ISCs had characteristic wedge-like shapes and were mostly proliferative, as shown by Ki67 staining.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To ascertain the loss of ISCs in crypts upon transgenic BRAF V600K induction, we analyzed the expression of several ISC marker genes 23 by qRT-PCR and found all markers strongly reduced in the induced intestines ( Figure 3b).…”
Section: Above)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We plan subsequently to micro-dissect these LRCs to see if FOXF1 or indeed Bmi1, Tert, Hopx and Lrig1 are factors dictating fate 46 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We observed no differences in the intensity of Brg1 staining between CBC cells and other epithelial cells. Additionally, Brg1 was not found to be differentially expressed between Lgr5 high and Lgr5 low cell populations using various transcriptome and proteome platforms [28]. Therefore, its selective requirement for stem cell homeostasis is likely to be due to differential recruitment to the promoters of the genes involved in control of the stem cell fate.…”
Section: Discussion Brg1 Is Essential For the Small Intestinal Stem Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other small intestinal stem cell markers including Lrg5, Ascl2, and Bmi1 were not detected among the differentially expressed genes. In order to search for other genes potentially involved in Brg1-mediated stem cell maintenance, we compared the list of differentially expressed genes in Brg1 deficient epithelium to a comprehensive stem cell signature profile as defined by genes preferentially expressed in small intestinal Lgr5 positive cells [28]. Out of 86 differentially expressed genes, 9 genes were present in the intestinal stem cell signature (Supporting Information Table S1).…”
Section: Brg1 Loss Compromises Stem Cell Maintenance In the Murine Smmentioning
confidence: 99%