2019
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1912.06874
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Liar's Walk: Detecting Deception with Gait and Gesture

Abstract: We present a data-driven deep neural algorithm for detecting deceptive walking behavior using nonverbal cues like gaits and gestures. We conducted an elaborate user study, where we recorded many participants performing tasks involving deceptive walking. We extract the participants' walking gaits as series of 3D poses. We annotate various gestures performed by participants during their tasks. Based on the gait and gesture data, we train an LSTM-based deep neural network to obtain deep features. Finally, we use … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Face-to-face deception. There has been much research on predicting whether an individual is deceptive from facial and body cues (Ding et al 2019;Randhavane et al 2019;Wang et al 2020) with extensions that also include audio and linguistic cues (Gogate, Adeel, and Hussain 2017;Wu et al 2018) However, most of these techniques do not work on group deception and do not consider inter-personal interactions in order to predict deception. We are the first to do so and to show that the Negative Dynamic Interaction Networks we propose are highly effective at detecting deception.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Face-to-face deception. There has been much research on predicting whether an individual is deceptive from facial and body cues (Ding et al 2019;Randhavane et al 2019;Wang et al 2020) with extensions that also include audio and linguistic cues (Gogate, Adeel, and Hussain 2017;Wu et al 2018) However, most of these techniques do not work on group deception and do not consider inter-personal interactions in order to predict deception. We are the first to do so and to show that the Negative Dynamic Interaction Networks we propose are highly effective at detecting deception.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ruiz-Garcia et al [29] and Tarnowski et al [30], use deep learning to classify different categories of emotion from facial expressions. Randhavane et al [31], [32] classify emotions into four classes based on affective features obtained from 3D skeletal poses extracted from human gait cycles. Their algorithm, however, requires a large number of 3D skeletal key-points to detect emotions and is limited to single individual cases.…”
Section: B Emotion Modeling and Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[23] use multiple modalities such as facial cues, human pose and scene understanding. Randhavane et al [28,30] classify emotions into four classes based on affective features obtained from 3D skeletal poses extracted from human gait cycles. Their algorithm, however, requires a large number of 3D skeletal key-points to detect emotions and is limited to single individual cases.…”
Section: Social Robotics and Emotionally-guided Navigationmentioning
confidence: 99%