2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.na.2015.06.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Lichnerowicz and Obata first eigenvalue theorems and the Obata uniqueness result in the Yamabe problem on CR and quaternionic contact manifolds

Abstract: We report on some aspects and recent progress in certain problems in the sub-Riemannian CR and quaternionic contact (QC) geometries. The focus are the corresponding Yamabe problems on the round spheres, the Lichnerowicz-Obata first eigenvalue estimates, and the relation between these two problems. A motivation from the Riemannian case highlights new and old ideas which are then developed in the settings of Iwasawa sub-Riemannian geometries.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 198 publications
(369 reference statements)
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where R f (Z) = ∇df (ξ, JZ), see [16,Section 7.1] and references therein but note the opposite sign of the sub-Laplacian, we obtain the next identity (3.6) 1 2 (∂ t − ∆)(uw) = − |∇ 2 f | 2 − Ric(∇f, ∇f ) − 2A(∇f, ∇∇f ) − 4R f (∇f ) u.…”
Section: The Cr Casementioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where R f (Z) = ∇df (ξ, JZ), see [16,Section 7.1] and references therein but note the opposite sign of the sub-Laplacian, we obtain the next identity (3.6) 1 2 (∂ t − ∆)(uw) = − |∇ 2 f | 2 − Ric(∇f, ∇f ) − 2A(∇f, ∇∇f ) − 4R f (∇f ) u.…”
Section: The Cr Casementioning
confidence: 78%
“…Since (2.10) still holds, working as in the qc case we compute M R F (∇f )u V ol η in two ways [7,Lemma 4] and [14,Lemma 8.7] following the exposition [16]. On the other hand, using again (3.7) but now we integrate and then use integration by parts we have At this point, exactly as in the qc case, we subtract (3.9) and three times formula (3.8) from (3.6), which gives…”
Section: The Cr Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proof of the local equivalence statement in Theorem 1.1 follows, for more details see [7,Theorem 1.2] in the case of positive qc-scalar curvature, the paragraph after [14,Lemma 8.6] in the zero qc-scalar curvature case, while the negative qc-scalar curvature case follows analogously. The global result in the case of a compact manifold is achieved by a monodromy argument and Liouville's theorem [14,Theorem 8.5], [3]. Below is an argument using that in our case Biquard's connection is an affine connection with parallel torsion and parallel curvature, hence we can invoke the results in [15,Chapter VI].…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Once we know this new notion of curvature, we can define the qc-Yamabe problem: determinate if there exists a metric e 2f g in the conformal class [g] with constant qc-scalar curvature. This problem has been solved in great generality, see [IV2] for a survey. In our case M = S 4n−1 , g = σ sR and for every i η i (·) = σ(ξ i , ·).…”
Section: The Biquard Connection and The Qc-scalar Curvaturementioning
confidence: 99%