2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jde.2021.10.062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The lifespan of classical solutions of semilinear wave equations with spatial weights and compactly supported data in one space dimension

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We compare all the lifespan estimates when a = −1 in our results as for F = t − x −(1+b) with those for F = x −(1+b) by Kitamura, Morisawa and Takamura [7]. If the total integral of g does not vanish, they coincide with each other.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We compare all the lifespan estimates when a = −1 in our results as for F = t − x −(1+b) with those for F = x −(1+b) by Kitamura, Morisawa and Takamura [7]. If the total integral of g does not vanish, they coincide with each other.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…✷ Proofs of Theorem 1.1 and Theorem 1.3. We shall employ the same argument as in the proof of Theorem 2.2 of [7]. We consider an integral equation:…”
Section: Proofs Of Theorem 11 and Theorem 12mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is almost trivial if one takes a look on the representation of u 0 in (2.4) and the support condition on the data in (2.1). But one can see also Proposition 2.2 in Kitamura, Morisawa and Takamura [7] for its details. So, our unknown functions are U := u − εu 0 and W := w − εu 0 t in (2.14).…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 22mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Sections 5, 6 and 7 are devoted to the proof of the existence part of (1.3). Their main strategy is the iteration method in the weighted L ∞ space due to Kitamura, Morisawa and Takamura [7,8] which is originally introduced by John [4]. Finally, we prove the blow-up part of (1.2) and (1.3), which is different from the functional method by Han and Zhou [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%