1961
DOI: 10.1029/jz066i010p03593
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The lifetime of radiation belt protons with energies between 1 kev and 1 Mev

Abstract: The lifetime of protons in the Van Allen radiation belts is limited by several loss mechanisms. During geomagnetically quiet periods the principal ones are probably Coulomb scattering and charge exchange with the components of the partly ionized exosphere. The Coulomb scattering lifetime has been calculated as a function of proton energy and equatorial scattering density by Wentworth, MacDonald, and Singer [1959]. The charge exchange lifetime is calculated here using experimentally measured cross sections.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should also be noted that charge exchange lifetimes for protons with 900 pitch-angles are about one day and are quite independent of energy from 5 to 30 keV, and that the lifetimes rapidly increase for higher-energy protons (Liemohn, 1961). In comparison, the gradient drift times from midnight to dusk for protons with nose energies (15 -20 keV) are about three hours.…”
Section: Effects Of the Plasmapausementioning
confidence: 98%
“…It should also be noted that charge exchange lifetimes for protons with 900 pitch-angles are about one day and are quite independent of energy from 5 to 30 keV, and that the lifetimes rapidly increase for higher-energy protons (Liemohn, 1961). In comparison, the gradient drift times from midnight to dusk for protons with nose energies (15 -20 keV) are about three hours.…”
Section: Effects Of the Plasmapausementioning
confidence: 98%
“…• ring-current decay and calculated charge-exchange lifetimes [Liemohn, 1961] as found by Swisher and Frank [ 1968] and Smith et al [1975] has been challenged by Tinsley [1976] and by Lyons and Evans [1976], partly on the grounds that Liemohn ' s lifetimes are too long (in view of recent results on neu tral hydrogen density ) and partly on the grounds that pitch-an gle distributions of low-energy ions do not behave in agreement wi th calcu lation .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The predicted values which were used are the lifetimes calculated by Liemohn (1961) for the ring current altitudes and rinn c-rent energies. This reference has been used consistently in previous wn O (Frank, 1967;Swisher and Frank.…”
Section: Decay Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%