The light curve of Nova (T) Coronae Borealis.

Campbell, Leon

doi:10.1086/106003

Cited by 6 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Early research in the region was conducted by Anderson (1932) in the Rio Grande delta and MacNeish (1947) in far southern Texas and northern Mexico. Early regional comparisons are also presented by Jackson (1940), Campbell (1947), and Kelley (1947).…”

Section: Regionalmentioning

confidence: 98%

Archaeology of the Brasada: A Cultural Resources Assessment of the Chevron Resources Company Properties in Northeastern Duval County, Texas

McGraw

Jones²

1987

ITA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Within the past decade, cultural resource management has become an increasingly significant aspect of archaeological investigations in southern Texas. Twenty-five new sites were identified, recorded, and assessed as the result of a 4000-acre cultural resources survey in northeastern Duval County, southern Texas, by the Center for Archaeological Research, The University of Texas at San Antonio, from October to December 1981. The investigations were carried out under the requirements and guidelines of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, the Vernon Texas Civil Statute 4590f, as amended, and the Guidelines for Archeological Investigations of Mining Areas in Texas (Texas Historical Commission 1981).

show abstract

Section: Regionalmentioning

confidence: 98%

Archaeology of the Brasada: A Cultural Resources Assessment of the Chevron Resources Company Properties in Northeastern Duval County, Texas

McGraw

Jones²

1987

ITA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Many people, institutions, and governmental agencies have undertaken archeological investigations on the central coastal plain of Texas. Among the more prominent of these are excavations by The University of Texas at Austin and the Works Progress Administration at the Johnson and Kent-Crane sites in the Copano Bay and Aransas Bay areas (Campbell 1947(Campbell , 1952; Story's (1968) excavations at the Ingleside Cove and Anaqua sites in San Patricio and Jackson Counties; excavations at 41AU37 and 41AU38 along Allen's Creek in southern Austin County by The University of Texas at Austin (Hall 1981); excavations by the University of Texas at San Antonio (UTSA) at the Hinojosa site situated approximately 60 km inland from Corpus Christi Bay (Black 1986); explorations by the Texas Historical Commission in the projected area of Palmetto Bend Reservoir along the Lavaca and Navidad Rivers of Jackson County (Mallouf et al 1973); UTSA survey and site testing in the area of Coleto Creek Reservoir in Victoria and Goliad Counties (Fox and Hester 1976;Fox et al 1979); extensive survey and excavation efforts, primarily by UTSA, at Choke Canyon Reservoir in Live Oak and McMullen Counties (K. Hall et al 1982Hall et al , 1986Highley 1986); excavations by the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) at the Loma Sandia site in Live Oak County and subsequent analysis by The University of Texas at Austin (Taylor and Highley 1995); TxDOT-sponsored excavations by UTSA at Mission Nuestra Señora del Refugio in Refugio County (Meadows et al 2002;Tennis 2002); Robert A. Ricklis's (1988Ricklis's ( , 1989Ricklis's ( , 1995Ricklis's ( , 1996 work at the Holmes and McKinzie sites, among others, in the Corpus Christi and Copano Bay area; testing and data recovery excavations at sites along the Victoria Barge Canal in Victoria and Calhoun Counties, much of which has not yet been published (Gadus et al 1999;Weinstein 1992); and recent work by the Texas Historical Commission at La Salle's Fort St. Louis and the first location of Presidio La Bahía (Bruseth and Durst 2002;Bruseth 2000, 2001;, as well as work at other Spanish Colonial Missionperiod sites (Calhoun 1999;Hindes et al 1999;Ricklis 1999;…”

Section: Previous Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Archeological Impact Evaluations and Surveys in the Texas Department of Transportation's Abilene, Austin, Brownwood, Bryan, Fort Worth, Waco, and Yoakum Districts, 2001-2003

2005

ITA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This document constitutes the final report of work done by Prewitt and Associates, Inc. (PAI), under a contract from the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) to provide archeological services in seven TxDOT districts—Abilene, Austin, Brownwood, Bryan, Fort Worth, Waco, and Yoakum. Under this contract, PAI completed Impact Evaluations and Surveys to assist TxDOT in meeting the requirements of their Memorandum of Understanding with the Texas Historical Commission and a Programmatic Agreement among the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, the Federal Highway Administration, the Texas Historical Commission, and TxDOT. The contract began on 21 September 2001, and the last work authorization was issued on 15 September 2003. During those two years, fieldwork was done under 96 work authorizations. The 97 work authorizations consisted of 94 Impact Evaluations, 74 Surveys, and 14 Surveys with Geoarcheological Evaluation. Combined, these work authorizations entailed efforts at 128 bridge replacements, 40 road realignments or widening projects (many also involving bridge replacements), 5 new road construction projects, 4 hike-and-bike trail construction projects, 4 rest area construction projects, 3 projects involving upgrades to 9 existing bridges or culverts, 2 projects where new borrow pits are planned, 2 projects involving relocation of historic bridges to public parks, 1 project involving construction of 2 new bridges, 1 project involving replacement of an interstate highway interchange, and 1 project involving establishment of a wetland mitigation area. During completion of these work authorizations, 43 newly discovered or previously recorded archeological sites were investigated, although in the case of 14 previously recorded sites, no archeological remains were observed in the areas that will be affected by the proposed Transportation Activities. Twenty-three of the Impact Evaluations led to recommendations that survey could be needed before construction, in some cases depending on whether new right of way would be required. Based on the limited potential for sites with good integrity, the other 71 Impact Evaluations resulted in recommendations that no survey be required before construction. Twenty-two of the Surveys investigated a total of 17 newly recorded and 9 previously recorded sites. Of these 26 sites, 6 were recommended for testing to assess eligibility for listing in the National Register of Historic Places and designation as State Archeological Landmarks. The other 82 Surveys either did not find any archeological sites or investigated sites that could be assessed as ineligible for National Register listing and State Archeological Landmark designation using the survey data. All artifacts collected and records generated by projects done under this contract are curated at the Texas Archeological Research Laboratory (TARL), The University of Texas at Austin. Artifacts were collected from four sites. Those from 41GM3 are from state-owned lands and thus are curated in a held-in-trust status at TARL. The artifacts from 41BU51, 41BU54, and 41LE325 are from private lands and are curated in a non-held-in-trust status.

show abstract

“…Based on excavations at the Johnson and Kent-Crane sites, Campbell (1947Campbell ( , 1952 included the conch shell adze as a cultural trait of the Archaic period. Sites situated along Oso Creek are characterized by surface scatters of lithic, shell and bone artifacts and various forms of occupational debris.…”

Section: Discussi-0n and Conclusionmentioning

confidence: 99%