2020
DOI: 10.1029/2018rs006763
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Limits of Empirical Electron Density Modeling: Examining the Capacity of E‐CHAIM and the IRI for Modeling Intermediate (1‐ to 30‐Day) Timescales at High Latitudes

Abstract: The Empirical Canadian High Arctic Ionospheric Model (E-CHAIM) is a new empirical 3-D electron density model intended as an alternative to the use of conventional standards, such as the International Reference Ionosphere (IRI), at high latitudes (above 50°N). In this study, we have manually scaled a year of data from two Canadian High Arctic Ionospheric Network (CHAIN) ionosondes. Using this high-quality data, we examine the behavior of the polar cap ionosphere under disturbed geomagnetic conditions and assess… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Maltseva and Nikitenko (2019) examined the performance of E-CHAIM in the representation of NmF2 in the Russian sector during a number of storms, where E-CHAIM performance appeared comparable to that of a GNSS TEC assimilation approach in reproducing nighttime enhancements in electron density associated with increased geomagnetic activity and capturing negative ionospheric storm responses. The recent Themens et al (2020) study further diagnosed the performance of E-CHAIM in the representation of the short time scale variability in NmF2, concluding that E-CHAIM is able to capture ∼25% of the variability of the ionosphere at sub-monthly time scales, mainly through its representation of negative ionospheric storm responses. In order to get a better idea of the model's performance as a whole and to identify potential shortcomings in this performance, further validation with respect to observations, not incorporated into the model during development, must be undertaken.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Maltseva and Nikitenko (2019) examined the performance of E-CHAIM in the representation of NmF2 in the Russian sector during a number of storms, where E-CHAIM performance appeared comparable to that of a GNSS TEC assimilation approach in reproducing nighttime enhancements in electron density associated with increased geomagnetic activity and capturing negative ionospheric storm responses. The recent Themens et al (2020) study further diagnosed the performance of E-CHAIM in the representation of the short time scale variability in NmF2, concluding that E-CHAIM is able to capture ∼25% of the variability of the ionosphere at sub-monthly time scales, mainly through its representation of negative ionospheric storm responses. In order to get a better idea of the model's performance as a whole and to identify potential shortcomings in this performance, further validation with respect to observations, not incorporated into the model during development, must be undertaken.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The reader may wish to consult Themens et al. (2018) for a full explanation of E‐CHAIM's storm perturbation model; however, the model mainly captures the decrease in ionospheric electron density on daily timescales that occurs during storms at high latitudes as a result of a relative increase recombination (Themens et al., 2020). This relative increase in recombination rate can result in a reduction to the plasma density by a factor of up to two in the F‐Region (Prölss, 1995).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the night sector, the D‐region model option plays virtually no role due to the lack of ionization; however, for rays that do propagate into the day sector, the inclusion ensures that this region is correctly modeled. The NmF2 Storm model option in E‐CHAIM represents the decrease in NmF2 in response to thermospheric composition changes and enhanced recombination during geomagnetic storms (Themens et al., 2018). The effect of this model is seen in Figure 2 by the clear reduction of the F‐region peak density compared to the default model.…”
Section: Methodology and Propagation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In recent years, the Empirical Canadian High Artic Ionospheric Model (E‐CHAIM) (Themens et al., 2017, 2018; Themens, Jayachandran, & McCaffrey, 2019) has emerged as the most reliable representation of electron densities at northern high latitudes (>50° geomagnetic latitude; Maltseva & Nikitenko, 2020; Themens et al., 2020; Themens, Jayachandran, McCaffrey, Reid, & Varney, 2019). E‐CHAIM is a significant improvement over other models such as the International Reference Ionosphere (IRI) at high latitudes, providing, for example, improvements of up to 60% in N m F 2 in the polar cap (Themens et al., 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%