2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0289.2009.00497.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The limits of globalization in the early modern world

Abstract: This article reviews the ways in which historians and economists have applied the term 'globalization' to the early modern era. It distinguishes a soft and a hard definition, and goes on to test the claims made about the driving forces shaping the growth and character of long-distance trade between Europe and Asia in the age of the European trading companies. On the basis of new estimates of the volume and value of European trade with Asia, the article concludes by identifying the factors limiting the growth o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(23 reference statements)
1
21
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The answer to this question depends on how globalization is defined. De Vries (2010) distinguishes between ''soft'' and ''hard'' globalization. Flynn and Giráldez claim that ''soft globalization'' started ''when the Old World became directly connected with the Americas in 1571 via Manila.''…”
Section: Globalization and Great Divergencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The answer to this question depends on how globalization is defined. De Vries (2010) distinguishes between ''soft'' and ''hard'' globalization. Flynn and Giráldez claim that ''soft globalization'' started ''when the Old World became directly connected with the Americas in 1571 via Manila.''…”
Section: Globalization and Great Divergencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also gained a place in society and a share of its income (Garrabou, Tello & Cussó, 2008;Garrabou et al, 2009). By increasing population numbers and deepening the home market, this eventually helped to turn Catalonia into a late-modern industrious society (Vries, 2010;Marfany, 2012) and an early-contemporary industrial economy (Valls-Junyent, 2004;Badia-Miró & Tello, 2014).…”
Section: Figure 4 Inequality Extration Ration (Ier) According To Clusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two centuries between the sixteenth and eighteenth centuries saw interaction capacity and polity diversity surge throughout the Indian Ocean. Commercially, the Europeans' arrival kick‐started the direct Europe–Asia trade, which grew twenty‐five‐fold in the three centuries to 1800 (De Vries :718). Moreover, the Europeans found that to pay for Asian merchandise, they had to generate profits by intraregional trade, for example, between Gujarat and the Swahili Coast of Africa, or Bengal and archipelagic South‐East Asia (Boxer ; Chaudhuri ; Pearson ; Subrahmanyam ).…”
Section: Diversity In the Early Modern Indian Oceanmentioning
confidence: 99%