2004
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6750-4-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The limits of log-ratios

Abstract: Background: DNA microarray assays typically compare two biological samples and present the results of those comparisons gene-by-gene as the logarithm base two of the ratio of the measured expression levels for the two samples.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fewer DE genes were identified in LumB and Normal-like tumors. Similar analysis of the METABRIC data failed to identify any DE genes in the LumB subtype, and relatively few in Normal-like tumors (Table 1 ), likely due to the small number of samples, and the lower dynamic range of microarray data as compared to RNA-Seq 31 . We therefore restricted our subsequent analyses to LumA tumors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Fewer DE genes were identified in LumB and Normal-like tumors. Similar analysis of the METABRIC data failed to identify any DE genes in the LumB subtype, and relatively few in Normal-like tumors (Table 1 ), likely due to the small number of samples, and the lower dynamic range of microarray data as compared to RNA-Seq 31 . We therefore restricted our subsequent analyses to LumA tumors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…For the microarray platforms, the discrimination between the target ratios is optimal near the middle of their dynamic range, and the ratios are “compressed” at both the lower and upper extremes. This constraint upon log 2 ratios has been previously described [ 15 ]. The ratios converge towards unity at lower end due to background noise, which is additive, and contributes to both samples being compared.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, DNA microarrays show reliable results only for medium expression levels and therefore have a much smaller dynamic range. Thus, RNA-seq provides much more informative data, requiring less biological material and lower costs, becoming this technique popular for measuring gene expression on a large scale (Sharov et al, 2004; Wang et al, 2009). …”
Section: Rna-seq: Advantages and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%