The Limits of Partnership: An Exit-Action Strategy for Local Democratic Inclusion

Abstract

The challenge of enhancing the "democratic anchorage" of partnerships has become a central concern in policy studies. Radical reform proposals designed to level the deliberative playing field include community veto powers and the appointment of neutral arbiters. Welcome as they would be, however, it is questionable whether such reforms would overcome power asymmetries in the partnership arena. A study of the local politics of social inclusion in two UK cities, Dundee and Hull, suggests that managerialism, driven by national governments, is eroding the prospects for partnership democratisation. But more significantly for the reformist agenda, public managers and community activists think in incompatible frames about the role of partnerships and in ways that are not understood by the other party. Non-communication undermines the prospects for an equitable deliberative consensus. Insights from Bourdieu suggest that even in more favourable deliberative environments than those in Dundee and Hull, subtle manifestations of power in culture, discourse and bearing would undermine the potential for a Habermasian consensus between radically unequal actors. In a radical departure from the network governance paradigm, it is therefore argued that empowerment may depend less on enhanced network democracy than on strong independent community organisation capable of acting separately and coercively against governing institutions and elites -an exit-action strategy. These preliminary conclusions point to a substantial research agenda on the politics of the state-civil society nexus.2

Los sistemas locales de bienestar. Un análisis desde las políticas de regeneración urbana

“…En esta misma línea, Banco, Bonet y Walliser (2011) señalan que la relación entre la regeneración urbana y la exclusión social se ha dado por sentada en algunos discursos, tanto académicos como internacionales, aunque la investigación en este asunto refleja la existencia de motivaciones diferentes (Davies, 2007). Es cierto que algunos programas de regeneración urbana se encuentran fuertemente asociados a la idea del desarrollo comunitario y la cohesión social, pero, en el otro extremo, otros programas se basan en una transformación radical de los usos y residentes, con un consecuente efecto de gentrificación del área.…”

Community empowerment and community cohesion: parallel agendas for community building in England?

“…And how far could citizens' engagement in structures of local governance impact upon the wider structural factors and policies that affect their lives (Taylor, 2006). In addition, a range of reports critically explore the impact of particular policies in practice (Skelcher, 2003;Mooney et al, 2006) questioning the extent to which decentralisation policies address issues of underlying power imbalances in partnership arenas (Davies, 2007).…”

Double-Devolution or Double-Dealing? The Local Government White Paper and the Lyons Review

“…Sensitive to this mood and recognising in recent years that centralization does not necessarily secure control (Davies, 2005(Davies, , 2007, the government has renewed its devolutionary rhetoric, drawing on the language of new localism, double-devolution (briefly during David…”