2016
DOI: 10.1080/14681366.2016.1263678
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The limits of pedagogy:diaculturalist pedagogyas paradigm shift in the education of adult immigrants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When we as educators practise one of various asset-based or critical forms of pedagogy, we tend to assume that as long as we agree with the tenets of the practice, our work will successfully enact the egalitarian or liberatory goals contained therein. In fact, white, US-born educators who label themselves "liberal", "progressive", or even "radical" may not recognise the blind spots endemic to their positionality and privilege or, an even greater task, be able to think and see outside the box of the monoculturalist, Western-centric worldview embedded in formal academic scholarship (Entigar 2017). It may be argued, in fact, that the highly moralistic discourse of inclusion precisely illustrates this problem, as US-born educators who "practise inclusion" may forgo asking crucial questions in their pedagogy, curriculum and ongoing professional learning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When we as educators practise one of various asset-based or critical forms of pedagogy, we tend to assume that as long as we agree with the tenets of the practice, our work will successfully enact the egalitarian or liberatory goals contained therein. In fact, white, US-born educators who label themselves "liberal", "progressive", or even "radical" may not recognise the blind spots endemic to their positionality and privilege or, an even greater task, be able to think and see outside the box of the monoculturalist, Western-centric worldview embedded in formal academic scholarship (Entigar 2017). It may be argued, in fact, that the highly moralistic discourse of inclusion precisely illustrates this problem, as US-born educators who "practise inclusion" may forgo asking crucial questions in their pedagogy, curriculum and ongoing professional learning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adult immigrant learners are transnational people living across political and social locations, including some which are contingent, liminal and subject to change, particularly in the case of undocumented people, asylum seekers and refugees (Aguilar 2019;Cannella and Huerta 2019). At the same time, under the rubrics of nationalism and protectionism, immigrants are racialised and homogenised, vilified as criminals or economic and social dependents, and their lived realities are distilled into the simple category of "outsider" (Entigar 2017). Such discursive tactics illustrate nationalist goals of erasure and exclusion of immigrants in the US and elsewhere, even as immigrant individuals and communities are "included" through physical control and containment (Arendt 2004, as cited in Hayden 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…English is the dominant language in the US and as a mono‐linguist culture language plays a large role in immigrant learners and pedagogy in the US and in Adult Education programs. Entigar () critiques and confronts "monoculturalist, US‐centric, paternalistic social and academic tradition of telling adult immigrant learners who they are, what they know, and how they learn via the creation of ill‐fitting and invisibleizing pedagogies" (p. 354). The path forward for an educator/practitioner is to challenge US academic traditions that minimized the culture of students to replaced it with American culture.…”
Section: Culturally Relevant Pedagogy In Practicementioning
confidence: 99%