2011
DOI: 10.1080/1369183x.2011.576188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Limits of the Liberal State: Migration, Identity and Belonging in Europe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To only draw on a few examples-when mainstream parties in France pass a ban on religious attire; when mandatory integration classes are introduced in a number of 'progressive' countries; when Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte tells immigrants to 'integrate or leave'; and when putative liberal and Christian democrats are happy to keep avowed advocates of illiberalism like Viktor Orbán's Fidesz in their European People's Party group in the EU Parliamentone should perhaps see PRR parties' adoption of liberalism not as an exception, but as a clear repercussion of the increasing bankruptcy of the way that many mainstream actors use liberalism themselves. Indeed, while Northern European PRR parties may articulate a liberal illiberalism, Adamson, Triadafilopoulos and Zolberg (2011) have argued that a number of 'non-populist' European governments are increasingly putting forward an 'illiberal liberalism'. While it is important to acknowledge that the order of the modifier and the subject matters greatly here-as noted earlier, liberal illiberalism indicates that illiberalism still reigns supreme in this conjunction, while illiberal liberalism indicates the opposite-the line where one crosses over into the other is becoming less and less clear.…”
Section: The Purpose and Repercussions Of Liberal Illiberalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To only draw on a few examples-when mainstream parties in France pass a ban on religious attire; when mandatory integration classes are introduced in a number of 'progressive' countries; when Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte tells immigrants to 'integrate or leave'; and when putative liberal and Christian democrats are happy to keep avowed advocates of illiberalism like Viktor Orbán's Fidesz in their European People's Party group in the EU Parliamentone should perhaps see PRR parties' adoption of liberalism not as an exception, but as a clear repercussion of the increasing bankruptcy of the way that many mainstream actors use liberalism themselves. Indeed, while Northern European PRR parties may articulate a liberal illiberalism, Adamson, Triadafilopoulos and Zolberg (2011) have argued that a number of 'non-populist' European governments are increasingly putting forward an 'illiberal liberalism'. While it is important to acknowledge that the order of the modifier and the subject matters greatly here-as noted earlier, liberal illiberalism indicates that illiberalism still reigns supreme in this conjunction, while illiberal liberalism indicates the opposite-the line where one crosses over into the other is becoming less and less clear.…”
Section: The Purpose and Repercussions Of Liberal Illiberalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mexico's immigrants' institutional social capital is low since it manifests itself as racism, discrimination, an increasingly difficult regulatory framework, negative labeling, and stereotyping [51,52]. Negative components of ‗institutional' social capital [53,54], may cause different types of capital, and their conversion to symbolic capital, to be undervalued.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shar (2013) provides an account of Islamic tribunals operating in the UK and their legal authority. For a discussion on some of the specific problems brought about by large scale migration of religious minorities to the West and the emergence of 'illiberal liberalism,' see Adamson, Triadafilopoulos, andZolberg (2011) andNussbaum (1999). 13.…”
Section: S Larcommentioning
confidence: 99%